연구동향 분석
박사

모델링을 강조한 논의 기반 일반화학실험에서 학생들의 모델링에 대한 인지과정 탐색 = Investigation about the cognitive process of students modeling at modeling emphasized argument-based general chemistry experiment

이동원 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 모델링을 강조한 논의 기반 일반화학실험에서 학생들의 모델링에 대한 인지과정 탐색 = Investigation about the cognitive process of students modeling at modeling emphasized argument-based general chemistry experiment' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 모델
  • 모델링
  • 일반화학실험
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
301 0

0.0%

' 모델링을 강조한 논의 기반 일반화학실험에서 학생들의 모델링에 대한 인지과정 탐색 = Investigation about the cognitive process of students modeling at modeling emphasized argument-based general chemistry experiment' 의 참고문헌

  • 학생들의 글쓰기에 나타난 논의구조에 미치는 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동의 효과 분석
    남정희 장경화 최애란 한국과학교육학회지, 32(7), 1099-1108 [2012]
  • 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동에서 학생들의 반성적 사고와 읽기틀의 관계에 대한 고찰
  • 초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석
  • 지능의 관점과 교육적 시사
    심우엽 초등교육연구, 9, 33-48 [1995]
  • 중학생들의 과학글쓰기 교수법으로써 논의-기반 모델링 전략 개발과 효과. 박사학위논문
    조혜숙 부산대학교 [2014]
  • 작문의 인지적 과정에 영향을 미치는 요인
    박영목 작문연구, 16, 231-257 [2012]
  • 읽기틀을 이용한 탐구적 일반화학실험이 대학생의 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문
    허은아 부산대학교 [2011]
  • 읽기전략으로 사용된 읽기틀이 중학생들의 반성 글쓰기에 미치는 영향
    남정희 성화목 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), 249-265 [2013]
  • 의사소통과 국어교육의 내용
    이성영 국어교육학회, 4(1), 67-83 [1994]
  • 모델링 활동에 대한 과학 고등학교 학생들의 인식
    강성주 이화종 하지희 영재교육연구, 19(1), 187-205 [2009]
  • 논의과정을 이용한 과학 교수 학습 전략이 중학생들의 인지 발달 및 과학 학습에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문
    곽경화 부산대학교 [2005]
  • 논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 예비교사의 글쓰기 능력 및 화학개념 이해에 미치는 효과
    고미례 남정희 박덕찬 이동원 임재항 최애란 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), 1077-1091 [2011]
  • 논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 대학생들의 글쓰기에서 나타난 다중 표상 및 다중 표상의 내재성에 미치는 영향
    남정희 이동원 조혜숙 한국과학교육학회지, 31(6), 931-941 [2011]
  • 국어화용론
    김종택 형설출판사 [1982]
  • 과학탐구토론에서 예비교사들의 상호작용 유형 및 증거 유형 분석
    이봉우 임명선 Journal of the Society for the International Gifted in Science, 4(2), 85-95 [2010]
  • 과학적 모델에 대한 중․고등학생들의 견해
    김영희 노태희 차정호 대한화학회지, 48(6), 638-644 [2004]
  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vosniadou, S. (2002). Mental models in conceptual development. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 353–368). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tomasi, J. (1988). Models and modelling in theoretical chemistry. Journal of Molecular Structure, 179(1), 273–292.
  • Thinking Science 프로그램의 적용이 중학교 1학년 학생들의 인지발달에 미치는 영향
    남정희 이상권 최미화 최병순 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 422-431 [2002]
  • Steed, M. B. (1994). Effects of computer simulation construction on shifts in cognitive representation: A case study using STELLA. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
  • Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for science modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
  • Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodelling knowledge: Developing students’' understanding of scientific modelling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205.
  • Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.
  • Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers' knowledge and practices through modeling‐centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720-744.
  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, G. N. (2005). What scientists say: Scientists`views of models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Schecker, H. (1993). Learning physics by making models. Physics Education, 28(2), 102–106.
  • Saari, H., & Viiri, J. (2003). A research-based teaching sequence for teaching the concept of modelling to seventh-grade students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1333–1352.
  • Rouse, W. B. & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349–363.
  • Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustration models on high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500–529.
  • Perella, J. (1987). The debate method of critical thinking: An introduction to argumentation, Dubuque, A:Kendall/Hung.
  • Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554.
  • Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130.
  • National Research Council (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 10–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mendon a, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2013). The relationships between modelling and argumentation from the perspective of the model of modelling diagram. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2407-2434.
  • McDermott, M. (2009). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Mandinach, E. B. (1988). The cognitive effects of simulation-modelling software and systems thinking on learning and achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603–630.
  • M rquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers' discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90(2), 202-226.
  • Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V., & Strom, D. (1999). Building on children’'s intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schuable, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schuable, L. (2003). Origins and evaluation of model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 59–70). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000b). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39-48.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000a). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R. Glaser(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Volume 5: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 101-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16(7/8), 751–773.
  • Khan, S. (2007). Model‐based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905.
  • Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigation in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.
  • Justi, R. (2009). Learning how to model in science classroom: key teacher's role in supporting the development of students' modelling skills. Educaci n qu mica, 20(1), 32-40.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., & Hestenes D. (2008). Modeling Instruction: An Effective Model for Science Education. Science Educator, 17(1), 11-17.
  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
  • Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students’ systems modelling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345.
  • Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142.
  • Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60(8), 732-748.
  • Henning, H., & Keune, M. (2007). Levels of modelling competencies. In Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 225-232). US: Springer.
  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.
  • Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W. (2008). Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments. Annual International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
  • Hand, B. 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 (Science Writing Heuristic) 의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용
    곽경화 남정희 장경화 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936 [2008]
  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.
  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1-11.
  • Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students' epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7-22.
  • Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-53.
  • Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
  • Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73–78.
  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83–87.
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Model and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115-130.
  • Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27(1), 7–40.
  • Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Hug, B., Nelson, M., Beyer, C., Schwarz, C., & Reiser, B. (2008). MoDeLS: Designing supports for teachers using scientific modeling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, St. Louis, MO.
  • Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464–486.
  • Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Model-based learning and instruction in science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Clark, D. C. & Mathis, P. M. (2000). Modeling mitosis & meiosis. A problem solving activity. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 204–206.
  • Chamizo, J. A. (2013). A new definition of models and modeling in chemistry’ teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1613-1632
  • Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 119–135). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • Boulter, C. J., & Buckly C. B. (2000). Constructing a Typology of Models for Science Education. In J. K. Gilbert & B. C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in Science Education, (pp. 41-57). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publusher.
  • Bliss, J. (1994). From mental models to modelling. In H. Mellar, J. Bliss, R. Boohan, J. Ogborn, & C. Thompsett (Eds.), Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modelling in the curriculum (pp. 27–32). London: The Falmer Press.
  • Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students’ scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 213-238.
  • Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2002). Scientists’ thoughts on scientific models. Perspectives on Science, 10(3), 275–301.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.