연구동향 분석
박사

예비교사의 공학설계 활동에서 나타나는 인지적 인공물을 바탕으로 한 추론과정 분석 = An Analysis of Cognitive Artifacts-based Reasoning Process on Pre-service Teachers Engineering Design Activity

김오범 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 예비교사의 공학설계 활동에서 나타나는 인지적 인공물을 바탕으로 한 추론과정 분석 = An Analysis of Cognitive Artifacts-based Reasoning Process on Pre-service Teachers Engineering Design Activity' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 공학설계
  • 분산인지
  • 인지적 인공물
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
28 0

0.0%

' 예비교사의 공학설계 활동에서 나타나는 인지적 인공물을 바탕으로 한 추론과정 분석 = An Analysis of Cognitive Artifacts-based Reasoning Process on Pre-service Teachers Engineering Design Activity' 의 참고문헌

  • 초등학생의 과학 담화에서 나타나는 몸짓의 유형과 특징
    나지연 송진웅 초등과학교육,31(4),450-462 [2012]
  • 일과 에너지 수업에서 교사들이 사용하는 몸짓의 유형과 특징
    김희경 한미현 새물리,64(4),396-404 [2014]
  • 이해와 검토 단계를 강조한 비유 실험 설계전략을 활용한 탐구수업에서 나타나는 과학영재 사이의 언어적상호작용 분석
    노태희 유지연 ( Ji Yeon You ) 한국과학교육학회지,32(4),671-685 [2012]
  • 심장 혈액 흐름의 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 소집단 상호작용과 소집단 규범
  • 메타인지를 활용한 초등과학 영재프로그램이 학습 몰입도와 언어적 상호작용에 미치는 효과
    백성혜 이남주 초등과학교육, 32(4), 415-422 [2013]
  • 다수준 포함 교수법을 적용한 초등과학 프로그램에 서의언어적 상호작용 분석
    신영준 정숙진 한국과학교육학회지,33(7).1450-1470 [2013]
  • Zhang,J.,& Norman,D. A. (1994).Representations in distributed cognitivetasks.Cognitivescience,18(1),87-122.
  • Zhang,J.(1997).The nature ofexternalrepresentations in problem solving.CognitiveScience,21(2),179-217.
  • Yeo,S.,& Zadnik,M.(2001).Introductory thermalconceptevaluation: assessing students' understanding.The Physics Teacher,39(8), 496-504.
  • Yeo,J.,& Gilbert,J.K.(2014).Constructing aScientificExplanation?A Narrative Account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11),1-34.
  • Xu,L.,& Clarke,D.(2012b).Studentdifficultiesin learning density:a distributed cognition perspective.Research in Science Education, 42(4),769-789.
  • Xu,L.,& Clarke,D.(2012a).WhatDoesDistributedCognitionTellUs about Student Learning of Science?. Research in Science Education,42(3),491-510.
  • Wiser,M.,& Amin,T.(2001).“Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermalphenomena.LearningandInstruction,11(4),331-355.
  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
  • Wells,G.L.,& Petty,R.E.(1980).Theeffectsofoverheadmovements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. BasicandAppliedSocialPsychology,1(3),219-230.
  • Vygotsky,L.S.(2012).Thoughtandlanguage(pp.223-272).MIT press.
  • Vygotsky,L.S.(1981).The instrumentalmethod in psychology.The ConceptofActivityinSovietPsychology,135-143.
  • Vygotsky,L.S.(1980).Mind in society:The developmentofhigher psychologicalprocesses(pp.1-91).HarvardUniversityPress.
  • Voss,J.F.,Wolfe,C.R.,Lawrence,J.A.,& Engle,R.A.(1991).From representation to decision: An analysis ofproblem solving in international relations (pp. 119-158). Hillsdale, NJ, England: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
  • Van Someren,M.W.,Barnard,Y.F.,& Sandberg,J.A.(1994).The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes(Vol.2).London:AcademicPress.
  • Valkenburg,R.,& Dorst,K.(1998).The reflective practice ofdesign teams.DesignStudies,19(3),249-271.
  • Sweller,J.,& Chandler,P.(1994).Why some materialis difficultto learn.CognitionandInstruction,12(3),185-233.
  • Sweller,J.(2003).Evolutionofhumancognitivearchitecture.Psychology ofLearningandMotivation,43,216-266.
  • Suwa,M.,Purcell,T.,& Gero,J.(1998).Macroscopicanalysisofdesign processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions.DesignStudies,19(4),455-483.
  • Strack,F.,Martin,L.L.,& Stepper,S.(1988).Inhibiting andfacilitating conditions ofthe human smile:a nonobtrusive testofthe facial feedback hypothesis.JournalofPersonality and SocialPsychology, 54(5),768-777.
  • Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotionaland nonemotionalfeelings.Journalof Personality and SocialPsychology,64(2),211-220.
  • Stempfle, J. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2002. Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5): 473-496
  • Spillers,F.(2003).Task Analysis through Cognitive Archeology.D. Diaper y N. Stanton. The Handbook of Task analysis for Human-Computer Interaction,Eds,Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, London,279-290.
  • Songer,N.B.(1996).Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms:A caseofkidsasglobalscientists. TheJournaloftheLearningSciences,5(4),297-327.
  • Sinnott,J.D.(1989).A modelforsolution ofill-structured problems: Implicationsforeverydayandabstractproblem solving (pp72-99). PraegerPublishers.
  • Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically groundedeconomicreason(Vol.3).MIT press.
  • Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought (Vol. 1). Yale University Press.
  • Simoff, S. J., & Maher, M. L. (2000). Analysing participation in collaborativedesignenvironments.DesignStudies,21(2),119-144.
  • Seifert,C.M.,& Hutchins,E.L.(1992).Errorasopportunity:Learning inacooperativetask.Human?ComputerInteraction,7(4),409-435.
  • Schwarz,C.V.,Reiser,B.J.,Davis,E.A.,Kenyon,L.,Ach r,A., Fortus,D.,& Krajcik,J.(2009).Developing alearning progression forscientificmodeling:Making scientificmodeling accessible and meaningfulforlearners.JournalofResearch in ScienceTeaching, 46(6),632-654.
  • Schwartz,D.L.,& Black,J.B.(1996).Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science,20(4),457-497.
  • Schwartz,D.L.(1995).The emergence ofabstractrepresentations in dyad problem solving.TheJournaloftheLearning Sciences,4(3), 321-354.
  • Schnittka,C.G.,Bell,R.,& Richards,L.G.(2010).Savethepenguins: Teaching thescience ofheattransferthroughengineering design. ScienceScope,34(3),82-91.
  • Schnittka,C.,& Bell,R.(2011).Engineering design and conceptual changeinscience:Addressing thermalenergyandheattransferin eighth grade.InternationalJournalof Science Education,33(13), 1861-1887.
  • Salomon,G. (Ed.).(1993).Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
  • Rubin,D.C.(2006).The basic-systems model ofepisodic memory. PerspectivesonPsychologicalScience,1(4),277-311.
  • Roth,W.M.(2001).Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review ofEducationalResearch,71(3),365-392.
  • Roth,W.M.(2000).From gesture to scientific language.Journalof Pragmatics,32(11),1683-1714.
  • Roth,W.M.(1996).Artand artifactofchildren'sdesigning:A situated cognition perspective.TheJournaloftheLearning Sciences,5(2), 129-166.
  • Resnick,L.B.,Pontecorvo,C.,& S lj ,R.(1997).Discourse,tools,and reasoning:Essaysonsituatedcognition(pp.1-20).SpringerBerlin Heidelberg.
  • Pushkin,D.B.(1997).Scientificterminologyandcontext:How broador narrow are our meanings?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(6),661-668.
  • Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributedscaffolding:Helpingstudentslearnsciencefrom design. JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,42(2),185-217.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory ofconceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
  • Peterson,L.,& Peterson,M.J.(1959).Short-term retentionofindividual verbalitems.Journalofexperimentalpsychology,58(3),193-198. Platt,J.R.(1964).StrongInference.Science,146(3642),347-353.
  • Perry,M.,O’Hara,K.,Spinelli,G.,&Sharpe,B.(2003).Theroleofspace in socially distributed cognition: some issues for cognitive engineering.In Proceedings ofthe 25th AnnualMeeting ofthe CognitiveScienceSociety(pp.916-921).
  • Perry,M.,& Sanderson,D.(1998).Coordinating jointdesign work:the roleofcommunicationandartefacts.DesignStudies,19(3),273-288.
  • Perry,M.(1998).Process, representation and taskworld: distributed cognition and the organisation ofinformation.In Exploring the contexts of information behaviour. Proceedings of the Second InternationalConferenceonResearchinInformationNeeds,Seeking and Use in differentcontexts (pp.552-567).13/15 August1998. Sheffield,UK.
  • Perkins,D.N.(1993).Person-plus:A distributed view ofthinking and learning. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations,88-110.
  • Pea,R.(1985).Beyond amplification:Using thecomputertoreorganize mentalfunctioning.EducationalPsychologist,20(4),167-182
  • Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. Distributed Cognitions Psychological and Educational Considerations, 47-87.
  • Patton,M.Q.(2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods(pp. 209-258).JohnWiley& Sons,Ltd.
  • Papert,S.(1980).Mindstorms:Children,computers,and powerfulideas (pp.19-37).BasicBooks,Inc.
  • Paik,S.H.,Cho,B.K.,& Go,Y.M.(2007).Korean4?to11?year?old studentconceptionsofheatand temperature.JournalofResearch inScienceTeaching,44(2),284-302.
  • Padalkar,S.,& Ramadas,J.(2011).Designed and spontaneousgestures inelementaryastronomy education.InternationalJournalofScience Education,33(12),1703-1739.
  • Norman,D.A.(1993).Things thatmake us smart.Defending human attributes in the age of the machine (pp 115-184).New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Norman, D.A. (1991). Cognitive Artifacts. In Carroll(Ed.) Designing interaction: psychology at the human computer interface (pp. 17-38).Cambridge:CUP.
  • Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
  • Nersessian,N.J.(2012).Engineering Concepts:The Interplay between Concept Formation and Modeling Practices in Bioengineering Sciences.Mind,Culture,andActivity,19(3),222-239.
  • Nersessian,N.J.(2002).The cognitive basisofmodel-based reasoning inscience.Thecognitivebasisofscience,133-153.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2009). How do engineering scientists think? Model-based simulation in biomedical engineering research laboratories.TopicsinCognitiveScience,1(4),730-757.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2006). Model?Based Reasoning in Distributed CognitiveSystems.PhilosophyofScience,73(5),699-709.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2005). Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions.ScientificandTechnologicalThinking,17-56.
  • Nersessian, N. (2008). Model-based reasoning in scientific practice. Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation,57-79.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 ScienceEducation: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Nardi, B.A. (1998). Concepts of cognition and consciousness: Four voices.JournalofComputerDocumentation,22,31-48.
  • Miyake,N.(1986).Constructive interaction and the iterative processof understanding.CognitiveScience,10(2),151-177.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity forprocessing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81-97.
  • Merriam,S.B.(2009).Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation(pp55-84).SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • McNeill,D.(2000).Catchments and contexts:non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. Language and gesture (pp. 312-328).Language and gesture (Vol.2).Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeill,D.(1992).Handandmind:Whatgesturesrevealaboutthought (pp.74-104).UniversityofChicagoPress.
  • McGerry,B.(2005).Things to Think With.DoctoralDissertation (pp. 33-62). Retrived from Department of ITEE, University of Queensland,Brisbane,Australia.
  • McDonald,G.,Le,H.,Higgins,J.,& Podmore,V.(2005).Artifacts,tools, andclassrooms.Mind,Culture,andActivity,12(2),113-127.
  • McClelland,J.L.,Rumelhart,D.E.,& PDP Research Group.(1986). Paralleldistributed processing (pp.280-317).Explorations in the MicrostructureofCognition.
  • Marzano, R. J. (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction.The Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development, 125 N. West St., Alexandria, VA 22314-2798.
  • Martin,A.(2007).The representation ofobjectconcepts in the brain. Annu.Rev.Psychol.,58,25-45.
  • Magnus,P.D.(2007).Distributed cognition and the task ofscience. SocialStudiesofScience,37(2),297-310.
  • Lumsdaine, E., Shelnutt, J. W., & Lumsdaine, M. (1999). Creative problem solving and engineering design. McGraw-Hill, Incorporated.
  • Lloyd,P.,& Scott,P.(1994).Discovering the design problem.Design Studies,15(2),125-140.
  • Lewis,E.L.,& Linn,M.C.(1994).Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricularimprovements.JournalofResearch in ScienceTeaching, 31(6),657-677.
  • Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation betweenscience and technology education in the curriculum?. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 43(3), 255?281.
  • Lemke,J.L.(1990).Talking science:Language,learning,and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation,355 ChestnutStreet,Norwood,NJ 07648
  • Lehtinen,E.,& Rui,E.(1995).Computer-supportedcomplexlearning:an environment for learning experimental methods and statistical inference.Machine-MediatedLearning,5(3),149-175.
  • Lehrer,R.,& Schauble,L.(2006).Cultivating model-based reasoning in scienceeducation.na.
  • Lehrer,R.,& Romberg,T.(1996).Exploring children'sdata modeling. CognitionandInstruction,14(1),69-108.
  • LeBaron,C.,& Streeck,J.(2000).Gestures,knowledge,and the world. LanguageandGesture,118-138.
  • Lawanto,O.,Santoso,H.B.,& Yang,L.(2012).Understanding ofthe relationship between interest and expectancy for success in engineering design activityingrades9?2.JournalofEducational Technology& Society,15(1),152?61.
  • Lave,J.,& Wenger,E.(1991).Situated learning:Legitimate peripheral participation(pp45-58).CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Lave,J.(1988).Cognitioninpractice:Mind,mathematicsandculturein everydaylife(pp97-123).CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Landis,J.R.,& Koch,G.G.(1977).The measurement ofobserver agreementforcategoricaldata.Biometrics,159-174.
  • Lakoff,G.,& Johnson,M.(1999).Philosophyintheflesh:Theembodied mindanditschallengetowesternthought.Basicbooks.
  • Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing.DesignStudies,25(4),351-371.
  • Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., &Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms:Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the LearningSciences, 7(3-4), 313-350.
  • Kolodner,J.L.,Crismond,D.,Fasse,B.,Gray,J.,Holbrook,J.,& Puntembakar,S.(2003).Putting a student-centered Learning by Design™ curriculum intopractice:Lessonslearned.Journalofthe LearningSciences,12(4),495-547.
  • Kolodner,J.L.,Camp,P.J.,Crismond,D.,Fasse,B.,Gray,J.,Holbrook, J.,& Ryan,M.(2003).Problem-based learning meetscase-based reasoninginthemiddle-schoolscienceclassroom:Puttinglearning bydesign(tm)intopractice.TheJournaloftheLearningSciences, 12(4),495-547.
  • Kolodner,J.L.(1997).Educationalimplicationsofanalogy:A view from case-basedreasoning.AmericanPsychologist,52(1),57.
  • Klahr,D.,& Dunbar,K.(1988).Dualspace search during scientific reasoning.CognitiveScience,12(1),1-48.
  • Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition.HumanDevelopment,26(4),222-232.
  • Kitcher,P.(1993).Theadvancementofscience(pp303-389).New York: OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Kirsh,D.(1996).Adapting the environmentinstead ofoneself.Adapt. Behav.4(3),415?452.
  • Kirsh,D.(1995).The intelligent use ofspace.ArtificialIntelligence, 73(1),31-68.
  • Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
  • Keller,B.A.,& Russell,C.A.(1997).EffectsoftheTI-92on Calculus Students Solving Symbolic Problems. International Journal of ComputerAlgebrainMathematicsEducation,4(1),77-97.
  • Kavakli,M.,& Gero,J.S.(2002).Thestructureofconcurrentcognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers.Design Studies,23(1),25-40.
  • Katehi,L.,Pearson,G.,& Feder,M.(2009).Engineering in K-12 education.Washington,DC:NationalAcademiesPress.
  • Kastens,K.A.,Rivet,A.,Lyons,C.,& Miller,A.R.(2013).Students’ use ofphysicalmodels to experience key aspects ofscientists’ knowledgecreationprocess.NARST.PuertoRico.April8.
  • Kastens, K. A., Agrawal, S., & Liben, L. S. (2008). Research methodologies in science education: The role of gestures in geoscienceteaching andlearning.JournalofGeoscienceEducation, 56(4),362-368.
  • Kafai,Y.B.(1995).Mindsinplay:Computergamedesignasacontext forchildren'slearning(pp.1-29).Routledge.
  • Justi,R.,& Gilbert,J.(2000).Historyandphilosophyofsciencethrough models:some challenges in the case of'the atom'.International JournalofScienceEducation,22(9),993-1009.
  • Jones,M.G.,Carter,G.,& Rua,M.J.(2000).Exploringthedevelopment of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convection and heat.Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 37(2),139-159.
  • Jonassen,D.H.(2000).Towards a design theory ofproblem solving. EducationalTechnologyResearchandDevelopment,48(4),63-85.
  • Jonassen,D.H.(1997).Instructionaldesign models forwell-structured andIII-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. EducationalTechnologyResearchandDevelopment,45(1),65-94.
  • Jonassen,D.H.(1994).Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers.ITForum Paper,1,67-80.
  • Hutchins,E.,& Palen,L.(1997).Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning (pp. 23-40).SpringerBerlinHeidelberg.
  • Hutchins,E.,& Klausen,T.(1996).Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit.Cognitionandcommunicationatwork,15-34.
  • Hutchins,E.,& Hazlehurst,B.(2002).Auto-organizationand emergence of shared language structure. In Simulating the evolution of language(pp.279-305).SpringerLondon.
  • Hutchins,E.(2006).The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. Roots of human sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction,375-398.
  • Hutchins,E.(1995b).How a cockpitremembers its speeds.Cognitive Science,19(3),265-288.
  • Hutchins,E.(1995a).Cognition in the wild.Cambridge,MA:TheMIT Press.
  • Hutchins,E.(1991).The socialorganization ofdistributed cognition.In L.B.Resnick,J.M.Levine& S.D.Teasley (Eds.).Perspectives on socially shared cognition. (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC.: AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.
  • Hollan,J., Hutchins,E., & Kirsh,D.(2000). Distributed cognition: toward anew foundationforhuman-computerinteractionresearch. ACM TransactionsonComputer-HumanInteraction(TOCHI),7(2), 174-196.
  • Hmelo,C.E.,Holton,D.L.,& Kolodner,J.L.(2000).Designing tolearn aboutcomplexsystems.TheJournaloftheLearningSciences,9(3), 247-298.
  • Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science.EuropeanJournalofScienceEducation,3(4),383-396.
  • Hennessy,S.,& Murphy,P.(1999).The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology.InternationalJournalof TechnologyandDesignEducation,9(1),1-36.
  • Hegarty,M.,Mayer,S.,Kriz,S.,& Keehner,M.(2005).The role of gesturesin mentalanimation.SpatialCognition and Computation, 5(4),333-356.
  • Hegarty,M.(2004).Mechanicalreasoning bymentalsimulation.Trends inCognitiveSciences,8(6),280-285.
  • Hatano,G.,& Inagaki,K.(1992).Desituating cognition through the construction ofconceptualknowledge:Light,P.E.,& Butterworth, G. E. (1992). Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing.LawrenceErlbaum Associates,115-133.
  • Harrison,A.G.,Grayson,D.J.,& Treagust,D.F.(1999).Investigating agrade11student'sevolvingconceptionsofheatandtemperature. JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,36(1),55-87.
  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.
  • Harel,I.(1991).Childrendesigners.Norwood:Ablex.
  • Halloun,I.(2006).Modeling Theory in Science Education.New York: Springer.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
  • Greenberg,J.D.,& Dickelman,G.J.(2000).Distributed cognition:a foundation for performance support. Performance Improvement, 39(6),18-24.
  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1-11.
  • Goodwin,C.(2000b).Gesture,aphasia,and interaction.Language and gesture,84-98.
  • Goodwin,C.(2000a).Action and embodiment within situated human interaction.Journalofpragmatics,32(10),1489-1522.
  • Goodwin,C.(1994).Professionalvision.American anthropologist,96(3), 606-633.
  • Goldstone,R.L.,& Barsalou,L.W.(1998).Reuniting perception and conception.Cognition,65(2),231-262.
  • Goldin?Meadow,S.(2006).Nonverbalcommunication:The hand's role intalkingandthinking.Handbookofchildpsychology.
  • Goel,V.(1995).Sketchesofthought.MItPress.
  • Glenberg,A.M.,Sato,M.,& Cattaneo,L.(2008).Use-induced motor plasticityaffectstheprocessing ofabstractand concretelanguage. CurrentBiology,18(7),290-291.
  • Gilbert,S.W.,& Ireton,S.W.(2003).Understanding Modelsin Earth & SpaceScience.(pp1-22).NSTA press.
  • Gilbert,J.K.,& Boulter,C.(Eds.).(2000).Developing modelsinscience education(pp3-18).Springer.
  • Gilbert,J.K.(2005).Visualization:A metacognitiveskillinscienceand science education.In Visualization in scienceeducation (pp.9-27). SpringerNetherlands.
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115-130.
  • Giere,R.N.(2002b).Scientific cognition as distributed cognition (pp. 285-302).TheCognitiveBasisofScience.
  • Giere,R.N.(2002a).Modelsaspartsofdistributed cognitive systems. InModel-BasedReasoning(pp.227-241).SpringerUS.
  • Giere,R.N.(1996).VisualModels and Scientific Judgment.Picturing knowledge:Historicaland philosophicalproblems concerning the useofartinscience,269.
  • Fortus,D.,Krajcik,J.,Dershimer,R.C.,Marx,R.W.,& Mamlok? Naaman, R. (2005). Design?based science and real?world problem?solving.InternationalJournalofScienceEducation,27(7), 855-879.
  • Edelson,D.C.,& Reiser,B.J.(2006).Making authentic practices accessibletolearners:DesignChallengesandStrategies.na. Fortus,D.,Dershimer,R.C.,Krajcik,J.,Marx,R.W.,& Mamlok? Naaman,R.(2004).Design?based science and studentlearning. JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,41(10),1081-1110.
  • Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking,teaching,and learning.Journalof EngineeringEducation,94(1),103-120.
  • Duit,R.,& Treagust,D.F.(2003).Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. InternationalJournalofScienceEducation,25(6),671-688.
  • Driver,R.,Asoko,H.,Leach,J.,Scott,P.,& Mortimer,E.(1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher,23(7),5-12.
  • Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. 1995. Comparing Paradigms for Describing Design Activity. Design Studies, 16(2): 261-274.
  • Denzin,N.K.(1970).The research act:A theoreticalintroduction to sociologicalmethods.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  • Cook,S.W.,Mitchell,Z.,& Goldin-Meadow,S.(2008).Gesturing makes learninglast.Cognition,106(2),1047-1058.
  • Cole,M.,& Engestr m,Y.(1993).A cultural-historicalapproach to distributed cognition.Salomon,G (red.) Distributed cognitions? PsychologicalandEducationalConsiderations.
  • Clement,J.(1993).Using bridging analogiesand anchoring intuitionsto dealwithstudents'preconceptionsin physics.JournalofResearch inScienceTeaching,30(10),1241-1257.
  • Clarke, D. (2001). Untangling uncertainty, negotiation and intersubjectivity. In Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms (pp. 33-52). Springer Netherlands.
  • Clark,H.H.(1996).Using language.(p.92).Cambridge:Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Clark,A.,& Chalmers,D.(1998).TheExtendedMind.Analysis,7-19.
  • Clark,A.(2003).NaturalBorn Cyborgs:Minds,Technologies,and the Future of Human Intelligence (pp. 59-88). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students'understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process ofconceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563.
  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension.(pp.30-43).OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World TogetherAgain(pp.179-218).MIT Press.
  • Clancey,W.J.(1997).Situated cognition:On human knowledge and computerrepresentations(pp.46-75).CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Christiansen,E.(1996).Tamed byarose:computersastoolsinhuman activity. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-ComputerInteraction(pp.175-198).MIT Press:Cambridge, MA.
  • Chi,M.T.,Slotta,J.D.,& De Leeuw,N.(1994).From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts.Learningandinstruction,4(1),27-43.
  • Chi, M. T., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability (p. 27). Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
  • Chi, M. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories:Examplesfrom learninganddiscoveryinscience.
  • Bryson,C.,& Hand,L.(2007).The role ofengagementin inspiring teaching and learning.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,44(4),349-362.
  • Brown,A.L.,Ash,D.,Rutherford,M.,Nakagawa,K.,Gordon,A.,& Campione,J.C.(1993).Distributed expertise in theclassroom.In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educationalconsiderations.(pp.188-228).New York:Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Brown,A.L.,& Palincsar,A.S.(1989).Guided,cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. Knowing, learning, and instruction.EssaysinHonorofRobertGlaser,393-451.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.(1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 18(1), 32-42.
  • Brooks,M.(2002).Drawing tolearn(Doctoraldissertation,Universityof Alberta).
  • Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s explorationof big ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3),319-341.
  • Bransford,J.D.,Brown,A.L.,& Cocking,R.R.(2000).How people learn(pp.79-113).NationalResearchCouncil.
  • Boulter,C.J.,& Buckley,B.C.(2000).Constructing a typology of models for science education.In Developing Models in Science Education(pp.41-57).SpringerNetherlands.
  • Becvar,A.,Hollan,J.,& Hutchins,E.(2008).Representationalgestures as cognitive artifacts for developing theories in a scientific laboratory.InResources,Co-Evolution andArtifacts(pp.117-143). SpringerLondon.
  • Bateson,G.(1972).Steps to an ecology ofmind:Collected essays in anthropology,psychiatry,evolution,andepistemology.Universityof ChicagoPress.
  • Baser, M., & Geban, O. (2007). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding ofheat and temperature concepts. ResearchinScience& TechnologicalEducation,25(1),115-133.
  • Barwise,J.,& Etchemendy,J.(1996).Heterogeneouslogic,in:Logical Reasoning with Diagrams(pp.179-200).Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Barsalou,L.W.(1999).Perceptions ofperceptualsymbols.Behavioral andbrainsciences,22(04),637-660.
  • Aydede,M.,& Robbins,P.(Eds.).(2009).The Cambridge handbook of situatedcognition.New York,NY:CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Apedoe,X.S.,Reynolds,B.,Ellefson,M.R.,& Schunn,C.D.(2008). Bringing engineering design into highschoolscience classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology,17(5),454-465.
  • Andriessen,J.(2006).Arguing to learn.In R.K.Sawyer (Ed.),The CambridgeHandbook oftheLearning Sciences(pp.443-459).New York:CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarksforscienceliteracy.OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Akin, O. & Lin, C. 1995. Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2): 211-236.
  • ABET, E. (2008). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effectiveforevaluationsduringthe2009-2010accreditationcycle.
  • 10학년 과학 교과서 지구 분야에 등장하는 과학적 모델 분석
    오필석 유정문 전원선 대한지구과학교육학회지,28(4),393-404 [2007]