연구동향 분석
박사

자기조절학습의 유형 탐색과 시간의 경과에 따른 변화 연구

정윤선 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 자기조절학습의 유형 탐색과 시간의 경과에 따른 변화 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 자기조절학습
  • 잠재전이분석
  • 잠재프로파일분석
  • 종단 연구
  • 학습유형
  • 학습자 유형
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,330 0

0.0%

' 자기조절학습의 유형 탐색과 시간의 경과에 따른 변화 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 협동학습 유형과 학습유형이 자기효능감과 학습태도에 미치는 효과
    한명숙 전북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 한국 대학생들의 자기조절동기, 학업정서 및 인지적 자기조절 학습전략 사용 간의 경로 탐색 연구
    김현진 김현진 ( Hyun Jin Jinny Kim ) 교육심리연구, 25(3). 693-716 [2011]
  • 학업적 자기효능감 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구
    김아영 박인영 교육학연구,39(1), 95-123 [2001]
  • 학업우수고등학교 학생들의 실패내성 특성 및 성취수준하락 극복과의 관계
    김영빈 청소년학연구, 18(1), 31-47 [2011]
  • 학업우수 청소년의 자아존중감 및 애착과학업적 실패내성과의 관계
    유성경 장수영 황매향 교육심리연구, 21(4), 1029-1046 [2007]
  • 학업상황의 정서조절 척도 개발 연구
    김은진 양명희 교육학연구, 50(3),253-275 [2012]
  • 학업상황에서 성공-실패 경험이 성취기대와 정서에 미치는 영향
    이종승 조난희 교육발전논총, 22(2), 25-36 [2001]
  • 학업동기 척도 표준화 연구
    김아영 교육평가연구, 15(1), 157-184 [2002]
  • 학습유형과 학습전략, 학습시간에 따른 전문대학생의 학업성취 경로분석
    송영주 열린교육연구, 21(4), 47-68 [2013]
  • 학습양식
    임창재 형설출판사 [1994]
  • 학습성 무기력의 발생원인
    신기명 건국대학교 대학원 논문집, 26, 39-59 [1988]
  • 학습부진프로그램, 수준별 이동수업 및 사교육이 저성취 중학생의 학업성취도와 자기조절학습능력 변화에 미치는 영향
    남창우 허유성 특수교육학연구, 44(3), 327-353 [2009]
  • 학습부진 학생들의 학업성취에 영향을 미치는 중재 방안에 대한 메타분석
    김수란 송인섭 교육방법연구, 24(4), 683-711 [2012]
  • 학습문제전문가자료집
    김만권 한종철 서울: 연우심리연구소 [2001]
  • 학습동기, 자기통제, 학습전략을 중심으로 한 초등학생의 잠재집단분석
    임효진 황매향 초등교육연구, 25(3), 27-54 [2012]
  • 학습 성격 유형 및 전공 만족도에 따른 학업성취 관련 변인에 관한 연구
    유나현 이경아 이기학 이은경 전주연 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 치료,16(1), 104-121 [2004]
  • 학령후기 학교적응 프로파일과 관련된 개인,가정환경 변인의 단기 종단적 분석: 잠재프로파일분석을 이용하여
    권재기 ( Jae Ki Kwon ) 정미경 ( Mi Kyung Chung ) 아동교육, 21(3), 147-167 [2012]
  • 학년 및 학업성취 수준에 따른 자기조절학습의 차이 분석
    정미경 교육심리연구, 13(4), 305-332 [1999]
  • 컴퓨터 실습수업에서 동료교수법과 학습자의 성향이학업 성취도 및 자기효능감에 미치는 영향
    강의성 우선자 허희옥 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 5(4),19-29 [2002]
  • 초등학생의 학업발달을 위한 학급단위 학업상담 프로그램개발
    권영배 이종연 상담학연구, 12(6), 2177-2199 [2011]
  • 초등학생의 자기결정성 동기요인이 인지전략과 학업성취에 미치는 인과관계의 검증
    류지헌 임지현 교과교육학연구, 12(1), 219-238 [2008]
  • 초등학생의 자기결정성 동기, 자기주도적 학습능력, 학업적 자기효능감, 학업성취의 인과관계
    주희진 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(2), 237-259 [2011]
  • 초등학생용 인지적, 정의적 학습양식 검사도구 개발 및 타당화
    김은정 한국초등교육학회 학술대회, 1-24 [2008]
  • 초등학생들의 학습동기의 변화
    이은주 초등교육연구, 14(1), 47-66 [2000]
  • 초등학생들의 잠재적 일탈집단 유형에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구
    현안나 사회복지연구, 40(1), 197-235 [2009]
  • 초등학교 영재아동의 사고양식과 학습양식 간의 관계탐색
    김희정 한기순 영재교육연구, 20(1), 289-316 [2010]
  • 초등과학수업에서 자기조절학습 유형에 관한 질적 사례 연구
    안미경 ( Mi Kyung Ahn ) 정영란 ( Young Lan Chung ) 초등교육연구, 25(2), 285-305 [2012]
  • 초?중등학생의 자기조정학습전략 및 의지통제전략 사용에서 차이
    이종삼 교육학연구, 35(1), 137-160 [1997]
  • 체육수업에서 지각된 가치와 자기효능감이 청소년의 방과후 신체활동에 영향을 주는가
    박중길 한국체육학회지-인문사회과학, 50(4), 53-65 [2011]
  • 청소년의 자기조절학습: 현황과 교육적 함의
    박승호 ( Seung Ho Park ) 서은희 ( Eun Hee Seo ) 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1S), 135-152 [2008]
  • 청소년의 자기 통제력, 학교수업 참여도,개인 학습시간과 학업성적 간의 관계
    김지현 유현실 최희철 하창순 한국청소년연구, 17(1), 181-200 [2006]
  • 청소년들의 학업정서 지각 유형과 자기조절학습과의 관련성
    권재기(Kwon, Jaeki) 양명희(Yang Myong-Hee) 한국청소년연구. 24(4), 203-229 [2013]
  • 청소년들의 유능성과 관계성 및 내재동기가 공부시간에 미치는 영향에 대한 종단연구
    김민규 ( Min Gyu Kim ) 김은주 ( Eun Joo Kim ) 교육심리연구, 25(2), 345-365 [2011]
  • 청소년들의 미래목표 인식, 자기조절학습전략, 학업성취도간의 종단적 관계 분석
    문병상 교육심리연구, 26(4), 983-1000 [2012]
  • 청소년기의 학습된 무기력
    봉미미 이명진 교육학연구, 51(1), 77-105 [2013]
  • 청소년기 우울-비행 공존 집단에 영향을 미치는 기질 및 성별의 효과: 잠재 프로파일 분석
    오경자 이주영 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(1), 53-72 [2010]
  • 청소년 인터넷 사용유형 군집에 따른 정신건강, 자기효능감및 자기조절 학습능력
    김정연 이동귀 한국심리학회지: 학교, 10(3), 409-428 [2013]
  • 집단따돌림 피해경험의 발달양상과 내면화⋅외현화 문제행동의 변화 －잠재계층 성장분석(LCGA)⋅다집단 성장혼합모형(GMM)을 이용한 종단연구－
    권재기 한국아동복지학, 34, 96-127 [2011]
  • 지연행동가들의 불안수준에 따른 자기조절학습의 차이
    서은희 교육심리연구, 21(3), 613-626 [2007]
  • 중학생의 자기조절학습에 관여하는 초인지, 초동기 및 의지통제와 학업성취와의 관계
    박승호 박지희 교육심리연구, 17(4), 1-17 [2003]
  • 중학생의 자기조절학습 유형에 관한 군집분석 연구
    박승호 교육심리연구,17(4), 299-314 [2003]
  • 중학생의 자기조절학습 검사 개발
    정미경 교육학연구, 41(4), 157-182 [2003]
  • 중학생의 동기조절전략과 자기결정동기 및 학업성취의 관계
    이종연 조은문 한국심리학회지: 학교, 7(3), 405-428 [2010]
  • 중학생들의 학습동기 다중지능, 학습양식과 학업성취 및 학교적응과의 관계
    김명희 차경희 하정희 열린교육연구, 14(3), 57-79 [2006]
  • 중학생들의 성취목표 프로파일 유형과 학습전략의관계
    김영미 이소영 장유진 청소년학연구, 18(5), 191-218 [2011]
  • 중고생들의 성취목표 잠재집단의 변화 : 학습동기 및 학업성취와의관련성을 중심으로
    임효진 청소년학연구, 20(2), 237-267 [2013]
  • 중·고등학생의 진로발달 관련 변인 및 진로교육경험과 자기주도 학습태도와의 관계
    김지은 최윤정 아시아교육연구, 13(2), 81-106 [2012]
  • 중,고등학생의 학업적 자기효능감, 타인기대와 학업성취도 관계에서 자기조절학습전략의 효과
  • 준모수적 집단 중심 방법을 적용한 청소년기 초기의 공격성변화에 따른 잠재계층 분류와 관련요인 검증
    노언경 홍세희 조사연구, 10(3), 37-58 [2009]
  • 주의산만ㆍ과잉활동 문제를 보이는 아동의 아동ㆍ청소년 행동평가척도(K-CBCL) 군집 분석
    문경주 박중규 오경자 하은혜 한국심리학회지: 임상, 18(2),199-207 [1999]
  • 종단프로파일분석과 군집분석을 이용한 잠재집단연구: 성장혼합모형과 비교를 통하여
    신택수 교육평가연구, 23(3), 641-664 [2010]
  • 정서조절이 학습전략에 미치는 영향: 정서를 매개로 하는 관계 검증
    김은진 양명희 교육심리연구, 24(2), 449-467 [2010]
  • 저성취 학습부진아동을 위한 학습전략 프로그램에 대한 분석적 고찰
    신종호 아시아교육연구, 3(1), 63-88 [2002]
  • 잠재적 프로파일 분석을 통한 애착 유형 분류
    김혜영 이동귀 이수란 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(1), 55-67 [2009]
  • 박사
    잠재계층분석(LCA)을 이용한 학업중단 청소년의 유형과 심리사회적 특성 연구
    김범구 명지대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 자기효능감 증진 프로그램이 초등학교 아동의 학습된 무기력에미치는 영향. 석사학위논문
    정남숙 부산교육대학교 [2006]
  • 자기효능감 수준에 따른 자기조절학습전략 훈련이 수학문장제 수행에 미치는 효과
    문병상 초등교육연구, 13(2), 67-86 [2000]
  • 자기회귀교차지연모형을 적용한동기, 인지, 행동조절전략의 종단적 관계
    문병상 교육심리연구, 28(2), 291-310 [2014]
  • 자기주도학습에 관한 국내 연구동향 및 과제
    이진욱 진영은 한국교육교육연구, 24(1), 221-249 [2007]
  • 자기주도적 학습과 학업성취도간의 관계
    양애경(Yang Ae Kyeong) 조호제(Cho Ho Jae) 한국교육논단,8(3), 61-82 [2009]
  • 자기조절학습훈련이 학습부진아의 자기효능감과 학업성취에 미치는 효과
    정은정 초등교육학연구, 12(1), 153-174 [2005]
  • 자기조절학습프로그램이 중학교 신입생의 학교생활적응에 미치는 효과
    김정섭 윤채영 이종화 사고개발, 7(2), 19-36 [2011]
  • 자기조절학습전략을 통한 읽기 중재가 주의력결핍과잉행동장애 아동의 읽기 이해력과 읽기 태도에 미치는 영향
    이후희 황순영 정서 행동장애연구,27(1), 1-21 [2011]
  • 자기조절학습의 현재와 미래 과제
    박승호 교육심리연구, 27(3), 629-646 [2013]
  • 자기조절학습의 복합적 측정도구 개발과 타당화: 동기조절 척도의 통합을 중심으로
    김선미 박병기 이종욱 정기수 교육심리연구, 19(2). 455-476 [2005]
  • 자기조절학습의 발달을 위한 동기적 요인의 역할
    박승호 교육심리연구,17(1), 55-70 [2003]
  • 자기조절학습의 모형탐색과 타당화 연구
    양명희 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2000]
  • 자기조절학습에서 메타인지의 기능에 관한 고찰
    박기현 이재신 교육연구논총, 28(3), 53-69 [2007]
  • 자기조절학습능력의 발달 추이
    선혜연 정애경 황매향 교육과정평가연구,15(1), 51-80 [2012]
  • 박사
    자기조절학습과 학업성취의 종단 관계 연구 : 자기회귀교차지연모형 및 잠재성장모형을 이용하여
    김동준 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2012]
  • 자기조절학습과 학업성취도의 관련성 : 변화추이 및 인과적 방향성 검토
    양명희 이경아 교육과학연구, 43(2), 175-195 [2012]
  • 자기조절학습과 학업성취도간 관계에서 사회심리적 환경이 매개효과: 종단연구를 중심으로
    전 훈 조현진 조형대 청소년학연구, 17(5), 171-192 [2010]
  • 자기조절학습과 지연행동과의 관계
    박승호 서은희 신명희 교육학연구,43(4), 277-292 [2005]
  • 자기조절학습과 정의적 특성의 관련성에 대한 메타분석
    양명희 최영아 중등교육연구, 61(4), 931-961 [2013]
  • 자기조절학습과 자기효능감
    방선욱 교육사상연구, 23(2), 103-123 [2009]
  • 자기조절학습 프로그램이 초등학생의 발달과 학업성취에주는 효과의 메타분석
    신인수 장봉석 교육과정연구, 29(4), 187-211 [2011]
  • 박사
    자기조절학습 프로그램이 과학탐구능력, 학업성취도, 과학적 태도 및 탐구동기에 미치는 영향
    정미선 부산대학교 박사학위논문 [2007]
  • 자기조절학습 척도 개발 및 구조 검증: 동기조절과정서조절을 중심으로
    양명희 정윤선 청소년학연구, 21(12), 239-266 [2013]
  • 자기조절학습 구조에 대한 발달적 경향 탐색
    정미경 영재와 영재교육,7(2), 21-38 [2008]
  • 자기조절전략, 성취목표지향과 대학생의 학습양식간의 관계
    서미옥 교육학연구, 50(1), 55-79 [2012]
  • 자기조절 학습프로그램이 수학 학습부진학생의 자기주도적 학습 능력 및 학업성취에 미치는 효과
    이성규 ( Sung Kyu Lee ) 장인실 ( In Sil Chang ) 초등교육연구, 22(4), 327-349 [2009]
  • 자기결정동기 프로파일에 따른 자기조절학습전략의 차이
    김은경 서은희 교육심리연구, 27(2), 395-407 [2013]
  • 인지진단모형을 적용한 잠재집단별 분수뺄셈검사 문제해결 전략의 차이 분석
  • 이러닝 수업에서 대학생의 자기조절학습에 영향을 미치는 과제가치, 자기효능감, 수업 성취목표구조, 학업정서 간의 구조적 관계
    유지원 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 15(4), 61-77 [2012]
  • 웹기반 과학 수업 방법과 자기조절학습 수준이 초등학생의 과학적 자기효능감과 과학 학업성취에 미치는 효과
    안도희 정은숙 초등교육연구, 22(2),281-305 [2009]
  • 영재학생의 자기조절학습전략에 영향을 미치는 개인, 가정및 교사요인 탐색
    김성연 한기순 청소년학연구, 18(12), 299-328 [2011]
  • 영재의 자기조절학습전략에 대한 종단연구
    조선미 영재와 영재교육, 10(3),33-52 [2011]
  • 영재와 일반 중학생의 성취목표지향성 프로파일 분석: 개인-중심적 접근의 활용
    손원숙 신이나 ( Shin Yina ) 한국심리학회지: 학교, 9(1), 65-83 [2012]
  • 영재아와 일반아의 시험불안, 학업스트레스 및 학업효능감 비교연구
    김은정(Eun Jung Kim) 양연숙(Yeon Suk Yang) 영재와 영재교육, 10(1), 123-142 [2011]
  • 영재들의 메타인지와 자기주도적 학습능력 간의 관계 : 자기결정성 학습동기의 매개효과
    이재신 이지혜 중등교육연구, 57(1), 89-114 [2009]
  • 수준별 수업에서의 상위 성취 학습자를 위한 교육과정 압축전략
    최호성 교육과정연구, 20(4), 67-85 [2002]
  • 성취목표지향성의 안정성 검토
    양명희 정윤선 교육심리연구, 26(1),251-270 [2012]
  • 성취목표지향 프로파일에 따른 자기조절학습과 학업성취의 차이분석
    김유진 교육연구논총, 32(1), 1-22 [2011]
  • 성적우수집단의 시험불안 수준과 자기주도적 학습태도에 관한 연구: 중학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로
    신희경 한국교육, 33(4), 3-31 [2006]
  • 사고양식 성취목표지향성, 성취도, 연령, 성별 특성이 교과흥미에미치는 영향-중고생의 과학교과를 대상으로-
    윤미선 교육심리연구, 21(3), 557-572 [2007]
  • 부모양육태도, 학업적 자기효능감, 성취목표지향성이 자기조절학습에 미치는 영향
    정정애 상담학연구, 11(3), 1191-1202 [2010]
  • 박사
    범주형 혼합모형의 잠재계층 수 결정을 위한 적합도 지수의 평가 : 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션 연구
    권재기 권재기 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2012]
  • 방과후학교 자기주도학습 프로그램이 중학생의 자기조절학습전략, 자기효능감, 학업성취도에 미치는 효과
    허은영 중등교육연구, 57(2), 209-234 [2009]
  • 반응속도 실험 수업에서 자기조절 학습 전략이 과학탐구 능력, 과학적 태도 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
  • 동기조절 훈련 프로그램이 자기조절학습과 학업성취에 미치는 효과
    김은영 ( Eun Young Kim ) 박승호 ( Seung Ho Park ) 교육심리연구, 20(1), 99-117 [2006]
  • 대학생의 진로 불안감 변화에 따른 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증
    노언경 직업교육연구, 30(1), 133-149 [2011]
  • 대학생용 동기조절전략 척도의 타당화
    박혜숙 전명남 사회과학연구, 38(2),23-45 [2012]
  • 다차원척도법을 활용한 탐색적 프로파일 분석-중학생들의자기조절학습 변인을 중심으로-
    박현정 양명희 교육평가연구, 20(4), 121-137 [2007]
  • 박사
    다변량 고차 잠재성장모형을 이용한 자기조절학습과 학업성취도의 종단적 관계 분석
    김효원 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2010]
  • 군집분포의 형태와 표본의 크기가 성장혼합모형 분석 결과에 미치는 영향 분석: 몬테-카를로 시뮬레이션 연구
    신택수 교육평가연구, 24(1), 107-127 [2011]
  • 군집분석을 활용한 아동의 학교생활적응 유형 분류와 영향요인 연구
    송종원 정경용 청소년문화포럼, 32, 119-143 [2012]
  • 군집분석을 통한 진로미결정 집단의 유형연구 (전문대 재학생을 중심으로)
    김기원 ( Ki Won Kim ) 박헌일 ( Hun Il Park ) 교육학논총, 24(2), 161-187 [2003]
  • 구성주의적 자기주도학습을 위한 학습력 분석과 학습모형 개발
    홍기칠 교육심리연구, 18(1), 751-774 [2004]
  • 교육인적자원부 2004 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 교육지표. 연구자료 ORM2005-63-1, 2005-63-2, 2005-63-3
    한국교육과정평가원 [2005]
  • 교사와 학생의 ICT 활용과 학생의 자기주도학습이 저성취 고등학생의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
    남창우 전 훈 한국교원교육연구, 29(1), 77-97 [2012]
  • 과학교사들의 실천적 지식 탐색을 통한 중학생의 학습양식 유형 분석
    이현주 최경희 최규리 학습자중심교과교육, 9(1), 149-166 [2007]
  • 고등학생의 학습목표 실천과정의 방해요소 분석
    김동일 신을진 교육학연구, 43(4), 221-246 [2005]
  • 고등학생 성취목표지향성 프로파일의 잠재전이분석
    손원숙 교육평가연구,26(4), 755-774 [2013]
  • 가정 경제의 변화에 대한 지각과 중간체계 유형에 따른 청소년의 정서프로파일
    김종백 문경숙 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(2), 39-56 [2010]
  • 『구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기』
    김주환 서울 : 커뮤니케이션북스 [2009]
  • 　자기조절학습검사(SLT)-중 고등학생용
    양명희 한국가이던스 [2013]
  • e-러닝 학습 핵심역량 및 학습스타일이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
    송영수 최영태 평생교육-HRD연구, 6(2), 57-76 [2010]
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation oflearning and performance. New York. NY: Routledge.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). In Motivation and self-regulatedlearning: Theory, research, and applications, edited by Schunk, Dale H.,Zimmerman, Barry J.,(pp.1-30). Mahwah, NJ, US:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates Publishers.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student Differences inself-regulated learnng: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacyand strategy use. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of astrategy model of student self-regulated learning. J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 80(3), 284.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases inself-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents' Development of PersonalAgency. The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Self-Regulatory Skill. pp. 45-69 in Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. eds. Frank Pajares and TimUrdan. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historicalbackground, methodological developments, and future prospects. AmericanEducational Research J ournal, 45, 166-183.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitiveperspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13?39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personalskill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73?86.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: AnOverview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
  • Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for Student Success in an OnlineCourse. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83.
  • Xu, M., Benson, S. N. K., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Steiner, R. P. (2010). Therelationship between parental involvement, self-regulated learning, andreading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS-Kdatabase. Social Psychology of Education, 13(2), 237-269.
  • Woodruffe, M. (1982). On model selection and the arc sine laws. The Annals ofStatistics, 10, 1182-1194.
  • Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students`motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International J ournal of Educational Research, 33, 7-8.
  • Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting collegestudents’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. TheJ ournal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199-221.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2010). Understanding and predicting the self-regulation ofmotivation in college students. International Conference on EducationalResearch, Seoul National University, October, 1.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an UnderemphasizedAspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4),189-205.
  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). College Students' Motivational Regulation During a BriefStudy Period. The Journal of Faculty Development, 16(2), 103-112.
  • Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation ofmotivation. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235.
  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and theireducational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
  • Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. EducationalPsychologist, 30(4), 173.
  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personalityassessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs,expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood throughadolescence. Development of achievement motivation(pp.91-120). AcademicPress.
  • Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). LASSI: Learning andStudy Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Intervertion with a focuson learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation(pp.727-747). San Diego:Academic Press.
  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. InWittrock, M. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching: ThirdEdition, Macmillan, New York, pp. 315?327.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
  • Wang, W. (2007). Software-supported self-regulated learning strategies in anacademic setting. Retrieved September 20, 2008 from Simon FraserUniversity Library, School of Interactive Technology: http://hdl. handle.net/1892/4207.
  • Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, studystrategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123-146.
  • Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Self-Regulatory Failure: AResource-Depletion Approach. Psychological Science, 11(3), 249-254.
  • Visconti, K. J. (2013). A Latent Profile/Latent Transition Approach to Children'sCoping with Peer Victimization. Arizona State University. DissertationPresented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the DegreeDoctor of Philosophy.
  • Vester, C. (2005). Learning styles and teaching. Retrieved April 13, 2008, fromhttp://www.teaching English.org
  • Vermunt, J. K., Langeheine, R., & Bockenholt, U. (1999). Latent Markov modelswith time-constant and time-varying covariates. Journal of Educationaland Behavioral Statistics, 24, 178?205.
  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In: J.A. Hagenaars and A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.): Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 89?106.
  • Velicer, W. F., Martin, R. A., & Collins, L. M. (1996). Latent transition analysisfor longitudinal data, Addiction, 91, 197?209.
  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning: AValidation Study. Educational and psychological measurement, 68(3),443-463.
  • Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes ingrowth mixture models. In G.R. Hancock & K.M. Samuelsen (Eds.)Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317-341). Greenwich,CT: Information Age.
  • Stubbe, H. E., & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2008). Self-directed adult learning in aubiquitous learning environment: A meta-review. In Proceedings of theFirst Workshop on Technology Support for Self-Organized Learners(pp. 5-28).
  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stallworth-Clark, R., Birenbaum, M, & Nasser, F. (2000). Test Anxiety andPerformance on Reading Competency Tests. Research and Teaching inDevelopmental Education, 17, 39-47.
  • Slavin, R. E., & Braddock III, J. H. (1993). Ability grouping: on the wrong track. College Board Review, 168, 11-17.
  • Sink, C. A. (1991). Self-regulated learning and academic performance in middleschool children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service N0. Ed 334 270).
  • Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Constructive learning: the role of the learner, in T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen, (Eds.), Designing Environments forConstructive Learning(pp. 291?313). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2008). Control, motivation, affect, and strategicself-regulation in the college classroom: A multidimensional phenomenon. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 443.
  • Senecal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and academicprocrastination. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 607-617.
  • Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems inmultivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.
  • Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals ofStatistics, 6, 461-464.
  • Schutz, P. A., & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 67-68.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-Regulation and Learning. PartTwo. Cognitive Contributions to Learning, Development, andInstruction.(Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Published Online.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning andperformance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ, England:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning:Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R.Pintrich, &M.Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation(pp. 631?649). San Diego,CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2.
  • Schunk, D. H. 1990. “Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning.” Educational Psychologist, 25 : 71-86.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). In D, Schunk, & B, Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation oflearning and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1983). Developing children’s self-efficacy and skills: the roles ofsocial comparative information and goal setting. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 8, 76-86.
  • Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, andlanguage (5th ed., pp. 467?521). New York: Wiley
  • Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differentialinvestment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions andattributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658.
  • Saarni, C., Mumme, D., & Camps, J. (1998). Emotional development: Action,communicational, and personality development, vol. 3, Handbook of childpsychology(pp. 237-309). New York: Wiley.
  • Ruthig, J. C., Perry, R. P., Hall, N. C., & Hladkyj, S. (2004). Optimism andattributional retraining: Longitudinal effects on academic achievement, testanxiety, and voluntary course withdrawal. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology 34, 709?730.
  • Roeder, K., & Wasserman, L. (1997). Practical uncertainty in latent classmembership: a case study in criminology. J ournal of the AmericanStatistical Association, 94, 766-776.
  • Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developingand assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scalesinstrument. The J ournal of Psychology, 87(2), 213-223.
  • Riding, R., & Smith, E. (1982). Type of instructional material, cognitive styleand learning performance. Educational Studies, 18(3), 323-340.
  • Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles?an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
  • Riding, R. J., & Buckle, C. F. (1990). Learning styles and training performance. Sheffield: Training Agency.
  • Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Heinle & HeinlePublishers, International Thomson Publishing Book Distribution Center,7625 Empire Drive, Florence, KY 41042.
  • Rathunde, K. (1993). The experience of interest: A theoretical and empirical lookat its role in adolescent talent development. Advances in Motivation andAchievement, 8, 59-98.
  • Rasmussen, E., Neuman, R., Heath, A., Levy, F., Hay, D., & Todd, R. (2002). Replication of the latent class structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivitydisorder (ADHD) subtypes in a sample of Australian twins. J ournal ofChild Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 1018-1028.
  • Ramaswavy, V., De Sarbo, W., Reibstein, D., & Robinson, W. (1993). Anempirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities withPIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103-124.
  • Pressely, M., & Ghata, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learningfrom text. Educational Psychologist, 25, 139-161.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and Predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learningquestionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation:The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82, 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. InM. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook ofself-regulation (pp. 451?502). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding Self-Regulated Learning. In P. Pintrich(Ed.), Understanding Self-Regulated Learning. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions instudents’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program ofqualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2),91-105.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: TheAchievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary EducationalPsychology, 36(1), 36-48.
  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-valuetheory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions ineducation. In P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun(Eds.), Emotion in education(pp. 13-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profileanalysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 32(1), 8-47.
  • Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individualcompetence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 217-253.
  • Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual orlearning style. In Learning Strategies and Learning Styles (pp. 83-100). Springer US.
  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 46(2), 128-148.
  • Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1983). Children's reading strategies, metacognition,and motivation. Developmental Review, 6(1), 25-56.
  • Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Development aspects of self-regulatedlearning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 87-102.
  • Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. (2007). Students’ emotions: A keycomponent of self-regulated learning? In P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun(Eds.),Emotion in Education(pp. 185-204). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
  • Op’t Eynde, P., & Turner, J. (2006). Focusing on the complexity of emotionissues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 361?376.
  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Deciding on theNumber of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth MixtureModeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
  • Nylund, K. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and anapplication to peer victimization. Doctoral dissertation, University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles.
  • Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academicachievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International J ournal ofEducational Research, 41(3), 198-215.
  • Norwalk, K. E., DiPerna, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2012). Examining early literacy skilldifferences among children in head start via latent profile analysis. SchoolPsychology Quarterly, 27(3), 170-183.
  • Ning H. K., & Downing, K (2010). The reciprocal relationship betweenmotivation and self-regulation: A longitudinal study on academicperformance. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 682-686.
  • Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007-2010). Mplus user’s guide(6th ed.) . LosAngeles: Authors.
  • Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study todecide on sample size and determine power. Structural EquationModeling, 4, 599-620.
  • Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered andvariable-centered analysis: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectoryclasses. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.
  • Muthen, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling andrelated techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan(Ed.), Handbook ofquantitative methodology for the social sciences(pp. 345-368). NewburyPark, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mun, E. Y., Alexander, V. E., Marsha, E. B., & Evgeny, G. W. (2008). FindingGroups Using Model-Based Cluster Analysis: Heterogeneous EmotionalSelf-regulatory Processes and Heavy Alcohol Use Risk. DevelopmentalPsychology, 44(2), 481-495.
  • Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Michou, A., & Lens, W. (2013). Perceivedstructure and achievement goals as predictors of students' self-regulatedlearning and affect and the mediating role of competence needsatisfaction. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 179-186.
  • Mirhashemi, M., & Goodarzi, H. (2014). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies: TheRole of Personal Factors (Motivational Beliefs and Personality). Journal ofEducational and Management Strudies, 4(1), 152-161.
  • Metallidou, P., & Vlachou, A. (2010). Children's self-regulated learning profile inlanguage and mathematics: The role of task value beliefs. Psychology inthe Schools, 47(8), 776?788.
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. J ournalof School Psychology, 44(5), 351?373.
  • Meece, J. L, & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students' achievementgoals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582-590.
  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York:Wiley.
  • McCown, W., Petzel, T., & Rupert, P., (1987). An experimental study of somehypothesized behaviors and personality variables of college studentprocrastinators. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(6), 781?786.
  • McCaulley, M. H. (1987). The myers?briggs type indicator: A jungian model forproblem solving. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987(30),37-53.
  • Matthews, D. B. (1991). The effects of learning style on grades of first-yearcollege students. Research in Higher Education, 32(3), 253-268.
  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Alan, W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping,defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study ofuniversity students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 617-628.
  • Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latentprofile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy ofperson-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models ofself-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 191-225.
  • Marcoulides, G., Emrich, C., & Marcoulides, L. (2008). Testing for MultigroupInvariance of the Computer Anxiety Scale. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 68(2), 325-334.
  • Marchand, G., & Skinner, E. A. (2007). Motivational dynamics of children'sacademic help-seeking and concealment. J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 99(1), 65-82.
  • Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In. R.B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan(Eds.), Methods and Modelsfor Studying the Individual(pp. 33-64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • MMPI 프로파일 유형들에 따른 자아방어기제의 특성
    박영숙 전현민 한국심리학회지: 임상, 14(1), 191-199 [1995]
  • Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2008). Developmental Typologies of Identity Formation and Adjustment inFemale Emerging Adults: A Latent Class Growth Analysis Approach. J ournal of Research on Adolescence, 18(4), 595-619.
  • Lubke, G., & Muthen, B. O. (2005). Investigating Population Heterogeneity WithFactor Mixture Models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21-39.
  • Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Preview Press the Escape keyto close Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and ItsRelationships with Self-Regulated Learning. Educational PsychologyReview, 20(4), 411-427.
  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Robin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components ina normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and effect:An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2),69-78.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The Role of Affect in Student Learning: AMulti-Dimensional Approach to Considering the Interaction of Affect,Motivation and Engagement. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.),Emotion in education(pp. 107-124.). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
  • Lindner, R. W., & Harris, B. (1992). Self-Regulated Learning and AcademicAchievement in College Students. Reports - Research; Speeches/MeetingPapers. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED345626.
  • Leutwyler, B., & Merki, K. M. (2009). School Effects on Students'Self-regulated Learning A Multivariate Analysis of the RelationshipBetween Individual Perceptions of School Processes and Cognitive,Metacognitive, and Motivational Dimensions of Self-regulated Learning. Journal for Educational Research Online/Journal fur BildungsforschungOnline, 1(1), 197-223.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
  • Lanza, S. T., Collins, L. M., Lemmon, D., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). PROC LCA: ASAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling,14(4), 671?694.
  • Langeheine, R., & Van de Pol, F. (1994). Latent Markov Chains. In J. A. Jagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon(Eds.), Applied Latent Class Analysis(pp. 304-341). Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuyper, H., Van der Werf, M. P. C., & Lubers, M. J. (2000). Motivation,Meta-Cognition and Self-Regulation as Predictors of Long TermEducational Attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation: AnInternational J ournal on Theory and Practice, 6(3), 181-205.
  • Kulikowich, J. M. (2007). Preface to the special issue: Applications of latentvariable modeling in educational psychology research. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 32, 1-3
  • Kuhl, J. (1987), Action Control: The Maintenance of Motivational States. InMotivation, Intention, and Volition, 279-291. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Kreuter, F, Yan, T, & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Good item or bad?can latentclass analysis tell?: the utility of latent class analysis for the evaluationof survey questions. J ournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A(Statistics in Society), 171(3), 723?738.
  • Kosnin, A. M. (2007). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement inMalaysian Undergraduates. International Education Journal, 8(1), 221-228.
  • Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The memorizingeffort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. J ournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 265-279.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning Style Inventory, version3, TRG Hay/McBer,Training Resources Group. 116 Huntington avenue, Boston, MA 02116,trg_mcber@haygroup.com
  • Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. EnglewoodCliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kleine, M., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. (2005). The structure of students'emotions experienced during a mathematical achievement test. ZDM(Theinternational Journal of Mathematics Education), 37(3), 221-225.
  • Kim, S. K., Frisby, C. L., & Davison, M. L. (2004). Estimating cognitive profilesusing profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS). MultivariateBehavioral Research, 39(4), 595-624.
  • Keirsey 이론에 의한 중,고등학생용 학습유형 검사의 개발 및 타당화
    권선방 박원모 이영순 천성문 상담학연구, 10(3), 1501-1519 [2009]
  • Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning Style : An overview. In J. W. Keefe(Ed), Studentlearning style: Diagnosing and prescribing programme. Reston, VA:National Association of Secondary School Principles.
  • Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments:Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use,metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of EducationalComputing Research, 30(1), 139-161.
  • Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factor. Journal of the AmericanStatistical Association, 90, 773-795.
  • Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
  • Jones, M. H, Alexander, J. M., & Estell, D. B. (2010). Homophily among peergroups members’ perceived self-regulated learning. The Journal ofExperimental Education, 78(3), 378-394.
  • Jackson, H. & Molloy.G. (1985). Some effects of feedback alone and four typesof self-consequation on selected measures of problem solving. Perceptualand Motor Skills, 61, 1005-1006.
  • Iwamoto, D. K. , Corbin, W., & Fromme, K. (2010). Trajectory classes of heavyepisodic drinking among Asian American college students. Addiction, 105,1912?1920.
  • Houston, M. (2004). Diverse Learners, School Administrator, 61(7), 46-49.
  • Hong, S. H., Hasche, L., & Bowland, S. (2009). Structural Relationships BetweenSocial Activities and Longitudinal Trajectories of Depression Among OlderAdults. The Gerontology, 49(1), 1-11.
  • Hong, S. C. & Pack, Y. S. (2012). An analysis of the relationship betweenself-study, private tutoring, and self-efficacy on self-regulated learning. J ournal of Educational Policy, 9(1), 113-144.
  • Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade,gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and IndividualDifferences, 19(2), 269-276.
  • Hofer, B. K., Yu S. L., & Pintrich. P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to beself-regulated learners. Self-regulated learning: From teaching toself-reflective practice,(pp.57-85).
  • Hix-Small, H., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Okut, H. (2004). A multivariateassociative finite growth mixture modeling approach examining adolescentalcohol and marijuana use. J ournal of psychopathology and BehavioralAssessment, 26, 255-170.
  • Hiroto, D. S. (1974). Locus of control and learned helplessness. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 102, 187-193.
  • Haughton, D. M. (1988). On the choice of a model to fit data from anexponential family. The Annals of Statistics, 16(1), 342-355.
  • Hartley, J. (2002). Notetaking in non-academic settings: a review. AppliedCognitive Psychology, 16(5), 559-574.
  • Hall, E. & Moseley, D. (2005). Is there a role for learning styles in personalizededucation and training? International J ournal of Lifelong Education, 24(3),243-255.
  • Hagenaars, J. & McCutcheon, A. (2002). Applied latent class analysis models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning andperformance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127?153). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grieder, S., Tiaden, C., Elke, A., & Steiner, G. (2006). Emotional Factors ofSelf-Regulated Learning in a Longitudinal Study. http://www.psycho. unibas.ch/files/lernstrategien/Dok_Kongressbeitraege/PaperAERA05_Grieder. pdf.
  • Gregorc, A. F. & Ward, H. B. (1997). Relating with Learning style. Columbia,CT : Gregorc Associates.
  • Greene, B. A., Debacker, T. K., Ravindran, B. & Krows, A. J. (1999). Goals,Values, and Beliefs as Predictors of Achievement and Effort in HighSchool Mathematics Classes. Sex Roles, 40(5-6), 421-458.
  • Greenbaum, P. E., Del Boca, F. K., Darkes, J., Wang, C., & Goldman, M. S. (2005). Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshmen college students. J ournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 229-238.
  • Gore, P. A. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes:Two incremental validity studies. J ournal of Career Assessment, 14(1),92-115.
  • Goodman, L. A, (1974a). The analysis of systems of qualitative variables whensome of the variables are unobservable. Part I -a modified latentstructure approach. American Journal of Sociology, 79(5), 117-1259.
  • Goodman, L. A (1974b). Exploratory latent structure analysis using bothidentifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61(2), 215-231.
  • Golay, K. (1982). Learning patterns and temperament styles. Manas-Systems.
  • Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2006). From “Nonrotators” in the MentalRotations Test: A Multigroup Latent Class Analysis. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 41(3), 261-293.
  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in theclassroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D.
  • Fortunato, V. J., & Goldblatt, A. M. (2006). An examination of goal orientationprofiles using cluster analysis and their relationships with dispositionalcharacteristics and motivational response patterns. J ournal of AppliedSocial Psychology, 36(9), 2150-2183.
  • Ferrari, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Examining Behavioral Processes inIndecision: Decisional Procrastination and Decision-Making Style. Journalof Research in Personality. 34(1), 127-137.
  • Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier : Learning and Teaching Stylein Collage Science Education. J ournal of Collage Science Teaching, 23,286-190.
  • Feinberg, R. A., Miller, F. G., Weiss, R. F. Steigleder, M. K., & Lombardo, J. P. (1982). Motivational aspects of learned helplessness. J ournal of GeneralPsychology, 106, 273-311.
  • Entwistle, N. J. (1979). Motivation styles of learning and the academicenvironment. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 190 636,University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh.
  • Elliott, E.S., & Dweck, C.S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
  • Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implicationsfor human resource development. Advances in Developing HumanResources, 6(2), 158-177.
  • Ekstrom, R. B., & Villegas, A. M. (1991). Ability grouping in middle grademathematics: Process and consequences. Research in Middle LevelEducation, 75(1), 1-20.
  • Eccles(Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation(pp. 249-284). SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Dunn, R. S., Dunn, K. J., & Price, G. E. (1989). Learning style inventory (LSI ). Price Systems, Incorporated (PO Box 1818, Lawrence 66044).
  • Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they... can they... be matched. Educational leadership, 36(4), 238-244.
  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls theedge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208.
  • Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary schoolstudents learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: Ameta-analysis on self regulation training programmes. EducationalResearch Review, 3, 101-129.
  • Dembo, R., Wareham, J., Poythress, N., Meyers, K., & Schmeidler, J. (2008). Psychosocial Functioning Problems Over Time Among High-Risk YouthsA Latent Class Transition Analysis. Crime & Delinquency October, 54(4)644-670.
  • Dembo, M. H., & Eaton, M. M. (2000). Self-regulation of academic learning inmiddle-level schools. The elementary School J ournal, 100(5), SpecialIssue: 473-490.
  • Csizer, K., & Dornyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles andtheir motivated learning behavior. Language learning, 55(4), 613-659.
  • Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Engel, S. G., Simonich, H., Smyth, J., &Mitchell, J. E. (2009). Daily mood patterns and bulimia behaviors in thenatural environment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 181-188.
  • Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement inclassroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
  • Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B.J. Zimmerman& D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:Theoretical perspectives. 2nd Editions, (pp.191?226). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis:With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley &Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Clifford, M. M., Kim, A., & McDonald, B. A. (1988). Responses to failure asinfluenced by task attribution, outcome attribution, and failure tolerance. The J ournal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 17-37.
  • Clark, S. L., & Muthen, B. O. (2009). Relating Latent Class Analysis Results toVariables not Included in the Analysis. Relating LCA Results, Submittedfor publication, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Chiauzzi, E., DasMahapatra, P., & Black, R. A. (2013). Risk behaviors and druguse: A latent class analysis of heavy episodic drinking in first-yearcollege students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 974-985.
  • Cheng, H. C., Lehman, J., & Armstrong, P. (1991). Comparison of performanceand attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes. AmericanJ ournal of Distance Education, 5(3), 51-64.
  • Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F.(2001). Academic self-efficacy and First-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
  • Chakin, L. B. (2002) An offender typology based on the personality assessmentinventory. Psychological Assessment, 8, 121-142.
  • Caprara, G., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G., & Barbaranelli,C., (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy forself-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. J ournalof Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525-534.
  • Brody, G. H., Yu, T., Chen, Y. F., Kogan, S. M., Evans, G. W., Beach, S. R., &Philibert, R. A. (2013). Cumulative socioeconomic status risk, allostaticload, and adjustment: A prospective latent profile analysis with contextualand genetic protective factors. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 913.
  • Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices oncollege grades. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405-410.
  • Braten, I., & Olaussen, B. S. (2005). Profiling individual differences in studentmotivation: A longitudinal cluster-analytic study in different academiccontexts. Contemporary Educational Psychologist. 30, 359-396.
  • Bong, M. (2001). Role of Self-Efficacy and Task-Value in Predicting CollegeStudents' Course Performance and Future Enrollment Intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 553-570.
  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: APerspective on Assessment and Intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2),199?231.
  • Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How Far Have We Moved Toward theIntegration of Theory and Practice in Self-Regulation? EducationalPsychology Review, 18(3), 199-210.
  • Boekaerts, M. (2007). Self-Regulation and Effort Investment. Child Psychology inPractice. Handbook of child Psychology. Published Online John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition andmotivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100-112.
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., &Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining thedoing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369?398.
  • Bezzina, F. H. (2010). Investigating gender differences in mathematicsperformance and in self-regulated learning: An empirical study fromMalta. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International J ournal, 29(7),669-693.
  • Beck, C. R. (2001). Matching teaching strategies to learning style preference. The Teacher Education, 37(1), 1-15.
  • Baumert, J., Fend, H., O’Neil, H. F. & Peschar, J. L. (1998). Prepared forlife-long learning: Frame of reference for the measurement ofself-regulated learning as a cross curricular competence (CCC) in thePISA project. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation andDevelopment.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control . New York, NY:Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioralchange. Psychological Review. 84: 191-215.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Roth, G., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2005) DirectlyControlling Teacher Behaviors as Predictors of Poor Motivation andEngagement in Girls and Boys: The Role of Anger and anxiety. Learningand Instruction 15, 396-412.
  • Artelt C. (2000) How Predictive are Self-Reported Strategies for Their ActualUse? Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie ?BERN-, 14(2-3), 72-84.
  • Arminger, G. Stein, P., & Wittenberg, J. (1999). Mixtures of conditional meanand covariance structure models. Psychometrika, 64, 475-494.
  • Allua, S. (2007). Evaluation of Single and Multilevel Factor Model Estimation. The University of Texas at Austin. Doctor of Philosophy.
  • Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship ofknowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575.
  • Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills,CA: Sage Press.
  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
  • Abara, B., & Lokena, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed studyin a pre-college sample. Learning Individual Difference, 20(1), 25-29.
  • "청소년들의 자기주도학습, 관계성, 자아개념 및 학업성취 간의 관계"
    김유리 안도희 교육학연구, 52(1), 1-25 [2014]