연구동향 분석
박사

연구개발과 기술혁신, 수출성과 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 식품제조기업을 중심으로

방상봉 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 연구개발과 기술혁신, 수출성과 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 식품제조기업을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • decision tree analysis
  • export
  • food processing industry
  • innovation
  • r&d
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
547 0

0.0%

' 연구개발과 기술혁신, 수출성과 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 식품제조기업을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국제조업의 기술혁신 결정요인과 시장구조
    박병진 『경제연구』, 제28권 제4호,pp. 75-98 [2010]
  • 한국무역 1조 달러 달성과 수출의 지속가능성을 위한 연구
    곽근우(Keun-Woo Kwak) 김학민 ( Hag Min Kim ) 『무역학회지』, 제38권 제1호, pp. 21-45 [2013]
  • 한국 수출기업의 혁신활동에 따른 영향요인과 수출성과에 관한 실증연구
    김귀옥 『통상정보연구』, 제14권 제2호, pp. 201-225 [2012]
  • 한국 기업의 해외마케팅 역량 결정 요인에 대한 실증 연구 -수출마케팅 능력과 수출 성과와의 관계를 중심으로-
    김용규 『인터넷비즈니스 연구』, 제7권 제2호, pp. 181-206 [2006]
  • 박사
    프랜차이즈 기업의 핵심역량과 시장지향성 : 환경 불확실성, 경쟁우위와 경영성과의 관계
    서민교 박사학위논문, 세종대학교, 서울 [2012]
  • 탐험과 활용의 혁신전략과 연구개발조직이 중소기업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향
    박상문(Sangmoon Park) 이병헌(Byungheon Lee) 『기술혁신학회지』, 제11권 제1호, pp. 118-143 [2008]
  • 중소기업의 R&D와 혁신:정부정책지원의 조절효과
    신진교 최영애 『국제경영연구』, 제15권 제1호, pp. 119-132 [2008]
  • 중소 제조기업의 기술혁신 성과 결정 요인에 관한 분석
    노재확(Jae-Whak Roh) 유연우(Yen-Yoo You) 『한국전자거래학회지』, 제15권 제1호, pp. 61-87 [2010]
  • 우리나라 중소기업 수출지원제도의 성과에 관한 실증연구
    정재승 박사학위논문,중앙대학교, 서울 [2006]
  • 연구개발 특성이 기업 연구 성과에 미치는 영향 분석
    김한주 황윤섭 『통상정보연구』, pp. 395-413 [2007]
  • 시장구조와 기술혁신
    鄭甲泳 『산업과 경영』, 제24권 제2호, pp. 97-117 [1987]
  • 소비자의 친환경농산물 구매행동 연구
    고정숙 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, 서울 [2007]
  • 기업의 혁신 활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향
    박재민(Jaemin Park) 이중만(Jungmann Lee) 『한국콘텐츠학회논문지』, 제11권 제3호, pp. 339-350 [2011]
  • 기업의 소유지배 구조와 수출
    김상호 『한국경제연구』, 제24호, pp. 203-233 [2009]
  • 기업규모와 기술혁신활동의 연관성: 우리나라 제조업에 대한 실증적 연구
    성태경 『중소기업연구』, 제25권 제2호, pp. 305-325 [2003]
  • “한국기업집단의 다각화와 연구개발”
    이원영 정진승 『산업조직연구』, 제7권 제1호,pp. 21-44 [1987]
  • “한국기업의 수출성과 선행요소에 관한 실증연구”
    김용규 『국제경영리뷰』, 제12 제2호, pp. 55-75 [2008]
  • “특허등록의 예측방법에 관한 연구”
    정원교 박사학위논문, 고려대학교, 서울 [2012]
  • “창조경제와 식품산업”
    임승택 『식품과 산업』, 제46권 제2호, p. 1 [2013]
  • “정책연구: 중소기업 수출지원제도의 인지도와 활용도가 수출성과에미치는 영향”
    문희철 오현정 『중소기업연구』, 제31권 제2호, pp. 295-316 [2009]
  • “정부 R&D 자금지원과 중소기업의 성과”
    김민창 성낙일 『중소기업연구』, 제34권제1호, pp. 39-60 [2012]
  • “우리 기업의 브랜드 세계화 전개 방향에 관한 연구", 『ITBI Review』
    한충민 제9권 제2호, pp. 145-166 [2003]
  • “외부자원의 활용이 벤처기업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향”
    박상문 이병헌 『중소기업연구』, 제28권 제2호, pp. 181-206 [2006]
  • “외부 자원 활용이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향”
    박상문 이병헌 이형오 『한국전략경영학회 학술대회발표논문집』, pp. 63-83 [2005]
  • “식품 특허 출원전략”
    손성철 『식품과 산업』, 제46권 제3호, pp. 49-52 [2013]
  • “수출여부에 따른 기업의 동태적 생산성 분석"
    김현호 신인용 『산업조직연구』, 제16권 제2호, pp. 39-74 [2008]
  • “수출성과와 기업특성”
    성태경 이종민 『기술혁신학회지』, 제8권 제1호, pp. 116-134 [2005]
  • “데이터마이닝 기법을 이용한 효과적인 연구관리에 관한 연구"
    문태수 이준한 황석해 『한국산업정보학회 학술대회논문집』, pp. 241-252 [1999]
  • “기업의 수출활동이 총요소생산성에 미친 영향도 분석”
    이시욱 최용석 『한국경제의분석』, 제15권 제1호, pp. 77-112 [2009]
  • “기업의 기술혁신성과 결정요인”
    김진석 성태경 『대한경영학회지』, 제22권 제4호,pp. 2017-2036 [2009]
  • “기업 혁신역량과 수출성과간의 관계 분석”
    김병귀 정용우 정헌주 『무역학회지』,제37권 제5호, pp. 369-390 [2012]
  • “기술혁신 활동, 기술적 성과, 경제적 성과 간의 관계에 관한 실증연구: 기술혁신형 중소기업을 중심으로”
    양동우 유태욱 『벤처경영연구』, 제12권 제4호, pp. 69-93 [2009]
  • “기술집약도에 따른 국내 제조업의 기술혁신 패턴 분석”
    나중덕 노지혜 정민근 『기술혁신연구』, 제18권 제2호, pp. 33-58 [2010]
  • “기술개발 지원 정책이 기업성과에 미치는 효과”
    김경환 신범철 이의영 『e-비즈니스연구』, 제10권 4호, pp. 367-389 [2009]
  • “국제경영전략”
    이장호 박영사이종일 김찬준(2007), “R&D 지원정책이 기술성과에 미치는 영향분석, 『기술혁신학회지』,제10권 제1호, pp. 1-21 [2003]
  • “국내 중소제조기업의 R&D투자 수준 결정요인에 관한 연구”
    홍지승 박사학위논문,고려대학교, 서울 [2013]
  • “과학기술의 새로운 패러다임과 경제”, 『정보통신정책연구원』
    이근 제4권 제32호,pp. 1-110 [2004]
  • “R&D 중심의 혁신경영”, 백산 출판사홍장표 김은영(2009), “한국 제조업의 산업별 기술혁신패턴 분석”
    황안숙 『기술혁신연구』, 제17권 제2호, pp. 25-53 [2003]
  • Williams, B. L., Suen, H. K., Rzasa, S. E., Heikkila, T., & Pennock-Roman, M. (2003). Diffusion of US army chemical weapons disposal technologies: public perceptionof technology attributes. J ournal of Environmental Planning and Management,46(4), 499-522.
  • Wang, L., Yeung, J. H. Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). The impact of trust and contract oninnovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 114-122.
  • Wakelin, K. (1998). The role of innovation in bilateral OECD trade performance. AppliedEconomics, 30(10), 1335-1346.
  • Vernon, R. (1966), International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 41, 191-207
  • Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information andperformance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European J ournal of InnovationManagement, 13(2), 128-154.
  • Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Harvard Business Press.
  • Tidd, J. (1997). Complexity, networks &learning: Integrative themes for research oninnovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1(01),1-21.
  • Stevens, G. A., & Burley, J. (1997). 3,000 raw ideas=1 commercial success. ResearchTechnology Management, 40(3), 16-27.
  • Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms innon-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. ResearchPolicy, 28(8), 819-832.
  • Sousa, C. M., Martinez?Lopez, F. J., & Coelho, F. (2008). The determinants of exportperformance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 343-374.
  • Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinantsof innovation. Research Policy, 31(6), 877-898.
  • Sokmen, N., & Gozlu, S. (2012). Impacts of destructive factors on the productdevelopment process: The decision-tree models for software intensive projects. InTechnology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012Proceedings of PICMET'12: (pp. 652-660). IEEE.
  • Sohn, S. Y., & Kim, J. W. (2012). Decision tree-based technology credit scoring forstart-up firms: Korean case. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 4007-4012.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits,capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55), TransactionPublishers.
  • Scherer, F. M. (1970). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston,MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Salter, A., & Gann, D. (2003). Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design,Research Policy, 32(8), 1309-1324.
  • Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1982). Innovation and the Small land Medium SizedFirm, London: Printer Publishers.
  • Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Internationalmarketing review, 11(1), 7-31.
  • Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2002). Innovation and export performance: evidence from theUK and German manufacturing plants. Research policy, 31(7), 1087-1102.
  • Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in smallelectronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7),1053-1067.
  • Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation, Small Business Economics, 22(2),141-153.
  • Quinlan, J. R. (1993). “C4.5: programs for machine learning”, Morgan kaufmann.
  • Posner, M. V. (1961). International trade and technical change. Oxford economic papers,323-341.
  • Porter, M .E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, NY: Free Press.
  • Petroni, G. (1985). Who should plan technological innovation?. Long Range Planning,18(5), 108-115.
  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and atheory. Research policy, 13(6), 343-373.
  • Nunes, P. M., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Leitao, J. (2012). Is there a linear relationship betweenR&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-techSMEs. Research Policy, 41(1), 36-53.
  • Nerkar, A., & Shane, S. (2007). Determinants of invention commercialization: Anempirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strategic ManagementJournal, 28(11), 1155-1166.
  • Mansfield, E. (1968). Industrial researches and technical innovation; an economicanalysis. NY: Norton.
  • Lueg, R., & Borisov, B. G. (2014). Archival or perceived measures of environmentaluncertainty? Conceptualization and new empirical evidence. EuropeanManagement Journal, 32(4), 658-671.
  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance ofSMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565-586.
  • Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2001). Location and network effects on innovation success:evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants, Research policy, 30(4),643-661.
  • Lopez Rodriguez, J., & Garcia Rodriguez, R. M. (2005). Technology and exportbehaviour: A resource-based view approach. International Business Review,14(5), 539-557.
  • Loof, H., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: Afirm-level innovation study. International J ournal of Production Economics, 76(1),61-85.
  • Loh, W. Y., & Shih, Y. S. (1997). Split selection methods for classification trees. Statistica sinica, 7(4), 815-84
  • Lind, M. R. (2002). Technological innovation pull. International J ournal ofEntrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(6), 584-587.
  • Lin, C., Jiang, J., Wu, Y. J., & Chang, C. (2011). Assessment of commercializationstrategy using R&D capability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(3),341-369.
  • Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L. A., & Bourgault, M. (1998). R&D-related capabilities asdeterminants of export performance. Small Business Economics, 10(4), 365-377.
  • Lages, L. F., & Montgomery, D. B. (2004). Export performance as an antecedent ofexport commitment and marketing strategy adaptation: Evidence from small andmedium-sized exporters, European J ournal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1186-1214.
  • Kotha, S., & Orne, D. (1989). Generic manufacturing strategies: a conceptual synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 211-231.
  • Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sourcesand significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities,Research policy, 24(2), 185-205.
  • Kleinknecht, A., & Poot, T. P. (1992). Do regions matter for R&D?, Regional studies,26(3), 221-232.
  • Kim, S. & Park, D. (2011), Ownership structure and Export Performance: Firm-LevelEvidence from the Republic of Korea, ADB Economics Working Paper Series,295.
  • Khandwalla, P. N. (1987). Generators of Pioneering-Innovation Management: SomeIndian Evidence, Organization Studies, 8, 39-59.
  • Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Innovation speed: a conceptual model ofcontext, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21(4),1143-1191.
  • Keizer, J.A., Dijkstra, L., Halman, J. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs. Anexploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineeringsector in Netherlands, Technovation, 22(1), 1-13.
  • Keesing, D. B. (1966). Labor skills and comparative advantage. The American EconomicReview, 249-258.
  • Hartigan, J. A. (1975), Clustering algorithms. John Willey & Sons.
  • Harris, R., & Li, Q. C. (2009). Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UKestablishments, Oxford economic papers, 61(1), 74-103.
  • Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). A resource-based view of innovativeness in small firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(2), 263-281.
  • Greenhalgh, C. (1990). Innovation and trade performance in the United Kingdom. TheEconomic Journal, 105(1), 105-118.
  • Girma, S., Gong, Y., Gorg, H., & Lancheros, S. (2012). Foreign ownership structure,technology upgrading and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms (No. 1793). Kiel Working Paper.
  • Gencturk, E. F., & Kotabe, M. (2001). The effect of export assistance program usage onexport performance: a contingency explanation. J ournal of InternationalMarketing, 9(2), 51-72.
  • Garcia?Valderrama, T., & Mulero?Mendigorri, E. (2005). Content validation of ameasure of R&D effectiveness. R&D Management, 35(3), 311-331.
  • Galbraith, J. K. (1952). American capitalism, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of differentsources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey,Research Policy, 38(7), 1125-1135.
  • Freel, M. S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking andproximity. Research Policy, 32(5), 751-770.
  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics (Vol. 2) . Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The economic journal, 98, 355-374.
  • Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management J ournal, 35(4), 795-827.
  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceivedenvironmental uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly, 17(3).
  • Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal ofeconomic literature, 26(3), 1120-1171.
  • Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants ofstrategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy ofManagement Journal, 27(3), 467-488.
  • De Jong, J. P., & Marsili, O. (2006). The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy ofinnovative small firms. Research policy, 35(2), 213-229.
  • Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization studies, 13(3),375-402.
  • Crum, R. E., & Gudgin, G. (1977). Non-production activities in UK manufacturingindustry. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  • Contractor, F. J., & Ra, W. (2002). How knowledge attributes influence alliancegovernance choices: a theory development note. J ournal of InternationalManagement, 8(1), 11-27.
  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Strobl, E. (2008). The environmental performance offirms: The role of foreign ownership, training, and experience. EcologicalEconomics, 65(3), 538-546.
  • Coccia, M. (2001). A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: theory andapplication in Italy. R&D Management, 31(4), 453-464.
  • Cincera, M., & Veugelers, R. (2013). Young leading innovators and the EU's R&Dintensity gap. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(2), 177-198.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating andprofiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  • Chen, J., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2005). The impacts of speed-to-market on newproduct success: the moderating effects of uncertainty. EngineeringManagement, 52(2), 199-212.
  • Chen, C. J., Chang, C. C., & Hung, S. W. (2011). Influences of technological attributesand environmental factors on technology commercialization. Journal of businessethics, 104(4), 525-535.
  • Cassiman, B., Golovko, E., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2010). Innovation, exports andproductivity?. International J ournal of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 372-376.
  • Brem, A., & Voigt, K. I. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in thecorporate front end and innovation management?Insights from the Germansoftware industry. Technovation, 29(5), 351-367.
  • Brem, A. (2008). The Boundaries of Innovation and Entrepreneurship-ConceptualConsiderations and Selected Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Gabler,Wiesbaden.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., & Olshen, R. A. (1984). Classification andregression trees. CRC press.
  • Bishop, P., & Wiseman, N. (1999). External ownership and innovation in the UnitedKingdom. Applied Economics, 31(4), 443-450.
  • Belderbos, R., Duvivier, F., & Wynen, J. (2009). Innovation and export competitiveness:Evidence from Flemish firms. Working Paper Steunpunt Ondernemen enInternationaal Ondernemen (STOIO) , 1-39.
  • Becchetti, L., & Rossi, S. P. (2000). The positive effect of industrial district on theexport performance of Italian firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 16(1),53-68.
  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Therate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609-626). Nber.
  • Almus, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms'innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany, J ournal of Business &Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226-236.