연구동향 분석
박사

유도 가열 타이포돈트 시스템을 이용한 설측 자가 결찰 브라켓과 전통 설측 브라켓의 하악 치아 배열 효율성 비교 = Alignment efficiency of different lingual bracket systems using Heat Induction Typodont System

도충식 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 유도 가열 타이포돈트 시스템을 이용한 설측 자가 결찰 브라켓과 전통 설측 브라켓의 하악 치아 배열 효율성 비교 = Alignment efficiency of different lingual bracket systems using Heat Induction Typodont System' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • hits
  • 설측 자가 결찰 브라켓
  • 유도 가열
  • 전통 설측 브라켓
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
21 0

0.0%

' 유도 가열 타이포돈트 시스템을 이용한 설측 자가 결찰 브라켓과 전통 설측 브라켓의 하악 치아 배열 효율성 비교 = Alignment efficiency of different lingual bracket systems using Heat Induction Typodont System' 의 참고문헌

  • 유도 가열에 의한 새로운 타이포돈트 시스템
    경인규 경희문 김지용 대한치과교정학회 임상저널. ;3:177?9 [2013]
  • 상악전치 후방 견인시 견인 loop 후방에 부여한gable bend 양에 따른 치아이동 양상에 관한 연구
    김희정 노준 전윤식 정상혁 대치교정지. ;34:33?45 [2004]
  • TMA wire 로 제작된 3 종류의 MVLAW(Multi-vertical loop archwire)의 초기응력분포에 관한 광탄성학적 연구
    이형철 전윤식 대치교정지. ;25:73?85 [1995]
  • Shalish M, Cooper-Kazaz R, Ivgi I, et al. Adult patients’ adjustability toorthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between Labial, Lingual, andInvisalignTM. European journal of orthodontics. 2011;1?7.
  • Scott P, Sherriff M, Dibiase AT, Cobourne MT. Perception of discomfortduring initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventionalbracket system: a randomized clinical trial. European journal of orthodontics.2008;30:227?32.
  • Rhee JN, Chun YS, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionlessmechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J of Orthod DentofacialOrthop. 2001;119:292?9.
  • Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. Prospective randomizedclinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracketsystems. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.2009;136:160?7.
  • Peter GM, Robert JW, Luis R. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventionalbrackets during initial alignment. Angle orthodontist. 2006;76:480-5.
  • Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, et al. Plaque retention by self-ligatingvs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria anddetection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. American journalof orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2009;135:426.e1?9; discussion 426?7.
  • Paul S, Andrew TD, Martyn S, Martyn TC. Alignment efficiency of Damon3self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: A randomized clinicaltrial. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.2008;134:470.e1-e8.
  • Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T.Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients withconventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthodontics & craniofacial research.2008;11:211?5.
  • Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligatingbrackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolvingmaxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. American journal of orthodontics anddentofacial orthopedics. 2010;137:12.e1?6; discussion 12?3.
  • Pandis N, Papaioannou W, Kontou E, Nakou M, Makou M, Eliades T. SalivaryStreptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligatingbrackets. European journal of orthodontics. 2010;32:94?9.
  • Padhraig SF, Andrew TD, Grammati S, Robert TL. Efficiency of mandibulararch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. American journal oforthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2009;135:597-602.
  • Padhraig SF, Andrew TD, Grammati S, Robert TL. Comparison of mandibulararch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewiseappliances. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.2009;136:340-7.
  • Ogura M, Yamagata K, Kubota S, Kim JH, Kuroe K, Ito G. Comparison of toothmovements using Friction-Free and preadjusted edgewise bracket systems.Journal of clinical orthodontics. 1996;30:325?30.
  • Nikolaos P, Argy P, Theodore E. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets: Aprospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Americanjournal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2007;132:208-15.
  • Nikolaos P, Argy P, Margarita M, Theodore E. Mandibular dental arch changesassociated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventionalbrackets. European journal of orthodontics. 2010;32;248-53.
  • Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics: Do they deliver what theyclaim? Australian dental journal. 2009;54:9?11.
  • Magali F, Ludger K, Susanne R, Andreas J, Christoph B. The levelingeffectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex toothmalalignments. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2009;70:285-96.
  • Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterioralignment. American journal of orthodontics. 1975;68:554?63
  • Kumar YM, Ravindran NS, Balasubramaniam MR. Holographic analysis of theinitial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs. Angleorthodontist. 2009;79:368?72.
  • Kim SJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Park SH. Three dimensional analysis of toothmovement using different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances. KoreaJ Orthod. 2008;38:376-87.
  • Jeon HJ, Park SH, Jung SH, Chun YS. Three dimensional analysis of toothmovement using different sizes of NiTi wire on NiTi scissors-bite corrector.Korea J Orthod. 2009;39:43-53.
  • Harradine N.W.T. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? Journal ofOrthodontics. 2003;30:262?273.
  • Graber LW, Jr. RLV, Vig KWL. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques.Elsevier Health Sciences. 2005;2208.
  • Geron S. Class II non-extraction treatment with self-ligating lingual brackets.2005;3(1). Available from: http://www.lingualnews.com (Accessed 1 July 2006)
  • Fleming PS, Johal A. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematicreview. The Angle orthodontist. 2010;80:575?84.
  • Damon DH. The Damon Low-Friction Bracket: A Biologically CompatibleStraight-Wire System. Journal of clinical orthodontics. 1998;32:670-680.
  • Chen SS-H, Greenlee GM, Kim J-E, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review ofself-ligating brackets. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacialorthopedics. 2010;137:726.e1?726.e18; discussion 726?7.
  • Chen J, Isikbay SC, Brizendine EJ. Quantification of three-dimensionalorthodontic force systems of T-loop archwires. Angle orthodontist. 2010;80:566?70.
  • Chaconas S, Caupto A, Miyashita K. Force distribution comparisons of variousretraction archwires. Angle orthodontist. 1989;59:25?30.
  • Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, et al. Transversal maxillary dentoalveolarchanges in patients treated with active and passive self-ligatingbrackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2011;14:222?33.
  • Caputo A, Chaconas S, Hayashi R. Photoelastic visualization of orthodonticforces during canine retraction. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacialorthopedics. 1974;65:250?9.
  • ?1. Geron S. Self-ligating Brackets in Lingual Orthodontics. Seminars inOrthododontics. 2008;14:64?72.