박사

영어 서법조동사에 관한 통시적 연구 = A Diachronic Study of the English Modals

이윤희 2015년
논문상세정보
' 영어 서법조동사에 관한 통시적 연구 = A Diachronic Study of the English Modals' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 과거동사
  • 문법화
  • 생성문법
  • 서법
  • 서법조동사
  • 영어
  • 조동사
  • 현대영어
  • 현재동사
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
599 0

0.0%

' 영어 서법조동사에 관한 통시적 연구 = A Diachronic Study of the English Modals' 의 참고문헌

  • 영어 중심서법조동사의 최근 변화
    김혜리 『현대문법연구』66, 21-46 [2011]
  • 『중세영어: 역사, 문법, 문헌』
    김혜리 서울: 한국문화사 [2013]
  • Warner, A. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Warner, A. 1992. Elliptical and Impersonal Constructions: Evidence for Auxiliaries in Old English. In Colman, F. (ed). Evidence for Old English: Material and Theoretical Bases for Reconstruction (Edinburgh Studies in the English Language 2), 178-210. Edinburgh: John Donald.
  • Warner, A. 1990. Reworking the History of the English Auxiliaries. In Adamson, S., Law, V. A., Vincent, N. and Wright, S. (eds). Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65), 537-559 . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Warner, A. 1983. Review Article on Lightfoot 1972a. J ournal of Linguistics 19, 187-209.
  • Warner, A. 1982. Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Visser, F. T. 1963-73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. vol. 4. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  • Vincent, N. 1994. Syntactic Change. In Asher, R. (ed). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 4457-4461. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Traugott, E. C. and K nig, E. 1991. The SemanticsPragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited. In Traugoot and Heine 1991. vol. 1, 189-218.
  • Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. vol. 2. Typological Studies in Language 19. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: an Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65, 31-55.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1986. On the Origins of And and But Connectives in English. Studies in Language 10, 137-150.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1982. From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semanticpragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds). Perspectives in Historical Linguistics, 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1980. Meaningchange in the Development of Grammatical Markers. Language Science 2, 44-61.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1978. On the Expression of Spatiotemporal Relations. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A., and Moravcsik, E. (eds). Universals of Human Language. vol. 4, 369-400. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Traugott, E. C. 1972. A History of English Syntax: a Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Tellier, A. 1962. Les Verbes Perfectopr sents et les Auxiliaries de Mode en Anglais Ancien: (VIIIE S. - XVIE S.). (Doctorat s lettres Dissertation, Paris.) Paris: C. Klincksieck.
  • Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  • Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of Categorization. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds). Cognition and Categorization, 27-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rom ro, C. 2005. The Syntactic Evolution of Modal Verbs in the History of English. Ph. D. Dissertation, Universit Paris III.
  • Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roberts, I. 1985. Agreements Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 21-58.
  • Radford, A. 2004. Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, S. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
  • Pollock, J. Y. 1989. Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365-424.
  • Plank, F. 1984. The Modals Story Retold. Studies in Language 8, 305-364.
  • Pintzuk, S., Tsoulas, G. and Warner, A. (eds). 2000. Diachronic Syntax: Modals and Mechanisms. Series Oxford Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
  • Pintzuk, S. 1995. Variation and Change in Old English Clause Structure. Language Variation and Change 7, 229-260.
  • Pintzuk, S. 1993. Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to INFL. The Linguistic Review 10, 5-35.
  • Pintzuk, S. 1991. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Palmer, F. R. 1990. Modality and English Modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.
  • Myhill, J. 1988. The Grammaticalization of Auxiliaries: Spanish Clitic Climbing. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 352-363.
  • Moss , F. 1945. Manuel de l'anglais du MoyenAge, VieilAnglais. Paris: Aubier.
  • Marantz, A. 1999. Creating Word above and below Little v. Ms. MIT.
  • Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lord, C. 1976. Evidence for Syntactic Reanalysis: From Verb to Complementizer in Kwa. In Steever, S. B., Walker, C. A. and Mufwene, S. S. (eds). Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, 179-191. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Lord, C. 1973. Serial Verbs in Transition. Studies in African Linguistics 4, 269-296.
  • Lightfoot, D. 1999. The Development of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Argument from Language Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Lightfoot, D. 1989. The Child's Trigger Experience. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 12, 321-375.
  • Lightfoot, D. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lehmann, C. 1991. Grammaticalization and Related Changes in Contemporary German. In Traugoot and Heine. 1991. vol. 2, 493-535.
  • Lehmann, C. 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. vol. 1. Arbeiten des K lner UniversalienProjekts( AKUP) 48. Cologne: Institut f r Sprachwissenschaft, Universit t zu K ln.
  • Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. and Smith, N. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Langacker, R. W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 5-38.
  • Langacker, R. W. 1977. Syntactic Teanalysis. In Li, C. N. (ed). Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57-139. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
  • Kroch, A. and Taylor, A. (eds). 2000. The PennHelsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania,.
  • Kemenade, A. van. 1993. The History of English Modals: a Reanalysis. Folia Linguistica Historia 13, 143-166.
  • Kemenade, A. van. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Kemenade, A. van. 1985. Old English Infinitival Complements and WestGermanic Vraising. In Eaton, R., Fischer, O., Koopman, W. and Leek, F. van der (eds). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41), 73-84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
  • Kemenade, A. van. 1984. Verb Second and Clitics in Old English. In Bennis, H. and Lessen Kloeke, W. V. S. van (eds). Linguistics in the Netherlands, 101-109. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. 1985. The Iconicity of the Universal Categories noun and verb. In Haiman, J. (ed). Iconicity in Syntax. Typological Studies in Language 6, 151-183. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. 1984. The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60, 703-783.
  • Hopper, P. J. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. In Traugott and Heine. 1991. vol. 1, 17-35.
  • Heine, B., Claudi, U. and H nnemeyer, F. 1991b. From Cognition to Grammar. In Traugott and Heine. 1991. vol. 1, 149-187.
  • Heine, B., Claudi, U. and H nnemeyer, F. 1991a. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Heine, B. 1994. Some Principles of Grammaticalization. Handout for 1992 Stanford and Berkeley Grammaticalization Workshop.
  • Heine, B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Halle, M. and Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds). The View from Building 20, 111-176. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Goossens, L. 1987. The Auxiliarization of the English Modals: A Functional Grammar View. In Harris, M. and Ramat, P. (eds). Historical Development of Auxiliaries, 111-143. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyer.
  • Goossens, L. 1982. On the Development of the Modals and of the Epistemic Function in English. In Ahlqvist, A. (ed). Paper from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics(Current Issues in linguistic Theory 21), 74-84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Giv n, T. 1975. Serial Verbs and Syntactic Change: NigerCongo. In Li, C. N. (ed). Word Order and Word Order Change, 47-112. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Frajzyngier, Z. 1991. The de dicto Domain in Language. In Traugott and Heine. 1991. vol. 1, 219-251.
  • Fischer, O., Kemenade, A. van, Koopman, W. F. and Wurff, W. van der. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In Blake, N. (ed). The Cambridge History of the English Language 1066-1476. vol. 2, 207-408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Depraetere I. and Reed, S. 2006. Mood and Modality in English. In Aarts, B. and Mcmahon, A. (eds). The Handbook of English Linguistics, 269-290. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Denison, D. 1993. English Historical Syntax. London and New York: Longman.
  • Denison, D. 1990. Auxiliary + Impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 9, 139-166.
  • Chomsky, N. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework. Ms. MIT
  • Chomsky, N. 1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, R. (ed). Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar , 417-454. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W. and Perkins, R. D. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Language of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bybee, J. L. and Pagliuca, W. 1985. Cross Linguistic Comparison and the Development of Grammatical Meaning. In Fisiak, J. (ed). Historical Semantics, Historical Wordformation, 59-83. Berlin: Mouton.
  • Bybee, J. L. and Fleischman, S. 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse: an Introductory Essay. In Bybee, J. L. and Fleischman, S. (eds). Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 1-14. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Bybee, J. L. 2008. Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency. In Brian, D. J. and Richard, D. J. (eds). The Handbook of Historical Liguistics, 602-623. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bybee, J. L. 1988. Semantic Substance vs. Contrast in the Development of Grammatical Meaning. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 247-264.
  • Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: a Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Brook, G. L. 1955. An Introduction to Old English. Manchester: Manchester University.
  • Blake, N. F. 1996. A History of English Language. London: MacMillan.
  • Bennett, P. A. 1979. Observations on the Transparency Principle. Linguistics 17, 843-861.
  • Bauschatz, P. C. 1972. The Modal Auxiliaries of English, Middle to Modern: Their Semantics. Ph. D. Dissertation, Columbia University.
  • Allen, C. L. 1986. Reconsidering the History of like. J ournal of Linguistics Inquiry 22, 375-409.
  • Allen, C. L. 1975. Old English Modals. In Grimshaw, J. (ed). Papers in the History and Structure of English, 91-100. Amherst: Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.
  • Allan, W. S. 1987. Lightfoot noch einmal. Diachronica 4, 123-57.