연구동향 분석
박사

에너지 기술기획 과정의 전략적 니치관리와 학습효과에 관한 연구

김봉균 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 에너지 기술기획 과정의 전략적 니치관리와 학습효과에 관한 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 국가연구개발사업
  • 기술기획
  • 기술혁신
  • 에너지기술
  • 전략적 니치관리
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
585 0

0.0%

' 에너지 기술기획 과정의 전략적 니치관리와 학습효과에 관한 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 혁신체제론의 진화 및 주요 논점
    구영우 민완기 조성복 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회 : 165-174 [2011]
  • 한국에너지기술평가원, 해상풍력기반조성연구, 산업통상자원부한성수, and 최새솔. "니즈속성의 중요성과 시급성에 의한 R&D 우선순위 결정에관한 탐색 연구
    기술혁신학회지 16.3 (2013): 650-671▒ [2013]
  • 한국 과학기술정책의 특성에 관한 시론적 고찰
    송성수 과학기술학연구?, v.2, no.1 [2002]
  • 프로젝트의 신규성 정도가 프로젝트 관리방식과 성과간의 관계에 미치는 영향.
    김선우 박오원 차종석 기술혁신학회지 15.2 : 421-442 [2012]
  • 통상자원부, 제6차 전력수급기본계획산업통상자원부(구 지식경제부)
    제 5차 산업기술혁신 5개년계획, 2009 [2013]
  • 통상자원부, 서남해 2
    5GW 해상풍력 종합추진계획산업 [2011]
  • 통상자원부
    제4차 전력수급기본계획산업 [2008]
  • 통상자원부
    해상풍력추진로드맵산업 [2011]
  • 탈추격단계에서의 정책과 행정체제 변화 (The Change of Policy andPublic Administration System in Post Catch-up Phase)
    성지은 과학기술학연구, 6, 45-75 [2006]
  • 지역혁신시스템의 구축과 반도체 제조장비 산업의 집적화에 관한 연구
    이상룡 [2001]
  • 지속가능한 사회기술시스템으로의 전환과 백캐스팅-네덜란드의 지속가능한 교통 식품 가정 시스템 전환 사례를 중심으로
    성지은 송위진 정병걸 과학기술학 연구, 2012년 2호 [2012]
  • 조직문화가 신제품개발 관리에 미치는 영향
    김지대 박상언 경영학연구 36.1 : 133-157 [2007]
  • 제도변화와 대체요인으로서 딜레마 대응에 관한 연구: 신･재생에너지 발전차액지원제도를 중심으로
    김태은 한국행정학보 43권 4호, 179-208 [2009]
  • 정부조직의 지식관리 성공을 위한 CoP 발전방향: 민간부문과의 사례 비교를 중심으로
    김구 한국공공관리학보, 22, 329-355 [2008]
  • 정부기술개발사업 과제기획과정에 있어 산업분석의 역할과의미.
    김봉균 박송동 기술혁신학회지 13.3 : 459-470 [2010]
  • 전력산업의 개혁방향과 주요 정책과제
  • 전략적 니치관리 (SNM) 를 활용한 정부 신재생 R&D 성장과정 분석.
    김봉균 문선우 기술혁신연구 20.2 : 161-187 [2012]
  • 재생에너지의 정치경제학
    오오시마 겐이치 아카데미프레스 [2013]
  • 연구기획시스템의 Best Practice 모형에 관한 연구
    김갑수 STEPI연구보고서 [2002]
  • 역진형 기술학습을 통한 한국원자력연구원의 핵연료피복관 기술개발 사례산업경제연구
    장승권 최종인 홍길표 21, 2549-2573 [2008]
  • 에너지패러다임의 녹색전환
    임성진 한국정치학회보 34.1 (2000): 275-299 [2000]
  • 에너지전환의 정치경제: 제도론적 고찰
    김종달 환경정책 6.2 (1998):53-129 [1998]
  • 에너지공급에 있어 국가의 과제와 지속가능한 재생에너지 보급촉진제도
    신정희 부산대 법학연구, 제52권, 제4호 [2011]
  • 에너지경제연구원, 유럽의 해상풍력 정책방향에 관한 연구
    산업통상자원부 [2010]
  • 실패를 통한 학습 (항공 사고를 통해 본 조직 학습의 다양성)
    송은영 장용석 한국사회학, 41, 163-196 [2007]
  • 신제품 개발팀의 특성이 신제품 개발 성과에 미치는 영향 : 조직학습 이론을 중심으로
    김형준 한국마케팅저널 4.3 : 23-41 [2002]
  • 신재생에너지 시장확대를 위한 정책수단의 비교
    권태형 정부학연구, 제18권, 제1호 [2012]
  • 시장의 실패 자본의 실패,
    김영규 인하대 출판부 [2000]
  • 시장 경계선 재구축, 핵심 역량, 전략적 학습이 가치 혁신 신제품개발에 미치는 영향
    김지대 경영학연구 37.5 : 1287-1308 [2008]
  • 수요중시 녹색기술 사업화 전략의 추진방안
    윤문섭 환경산업기술원 [2009]
  • 수소경제 실현가능성 제고를 위한 전략적 니치 관리
    박상욱 한국수소 및신에너지 학회 논문집(2011.4) [2011]
  • 선도기술개발사업(G7)의 정책결정 과정 분석:범부처간 추진 과정 및 민간 전문가역할을 중심으로 (기술혁신연구)
    이찬구 기술혁신연구 16권 2호
  • 삼성경제연구소, “신성장동력 육성의 비결, 정부 R&D”
    Issue Paper [2009]
  • 산업통상자원부
    제3차 신재생에너지 기술개발 및 이용보급 계획산업 [2008]
  • 비용편익분석의 유용성에 관한 이론적 검토
    오정일 한국정책학회 동계학술대회 논문집, 2011(0): p. 333-355 [2011]
  • 비용편익분석 이론과 기법의 최신 동향 연구
    박호정 고려대학교 식품자원경제학과 [2009]
  • 녹색성장과 에너지자원전략
    이재훈 나남출판 [2010]
  • 기술혁신이론 개관
    이공래 STEPI 연구보고서 [2000]
  • 기술혁신과 경제성장
    신태영 STEPI 연구보고서 [2005]
  • 기술특성을 고려한 정부R&D 역할론 프레임워크에 관한연구
    김경화 양혜영 정상기 정책분석평가학회보. 19(4)
  • 기술선택의 정치과정과 기술학습
    송위진 「과학기술학연구」제1권 제1호, 179-200 [2001]
  • 기술기획 과정에 있어 조직학습을 통한 지식창출에 관한 연구: 국가연구개발사업에너지 R&D 과제기획에 대한 실증분석.
    김봉균 기술혁신연구 21.1 : 303-330 [2013]
  • 규제영향분석상의 쟁점과 해소방법. 규제연구
    이성우 제13권 제1호 [2004]
  • 국회예산정책처
    신재생에너지보급사업평가 [2010]
  • 국가연구개발 생산성 제고를 위한 이슈와 과제
    김인호 허진희 대한민국과학기술연차대회 [2007]
  • 국가에너지위원회
    제1차 국가에너지기본계획(2008~2030) [2008]
  • 국가과학기술위원회
    국가기술지도 NTRM [2002]
  • 공공투자분석이 놓치고 있는 것 (환경요인을 고려한 도암댐 건설의 경제성 사후 분석)
    김성욱 이병량 한국거버넌스학회보, 17, 177-202 [2010]
  • 脫추격형 혁신과 통합적 혁신정책
    송위진 STEPI 연구보고서 [2010]
  • “지속가능한 기술을 향한 새로운 접근”
    박동오 송위진 「과학기술학연구」제8권 제2호, 57-81 [2008]
  • “사회기술시스템과 과학기술혁신정책”
    송위진 「한국기술혁신학회」제16권 제1호송위진, 기술혁신과 과학기술정책, 2006, 르네상스 [2013]
  • “미래예측 프로세스의 고도화 및 기술기획을 위한 지식시스템 구축에 관한연구”
    임현 KISTEP 연구보고서 [2010]
  • “네델란드의 에너지전환”
    김병윤 STEPI Working Paper, WP-2008-08 [2008]
  • X.Michael Song, Sabrina M. Neeleyb (doctoral candidate in marketing), YuzhenZhaoc“Managing R&D-marketing integration in the new product developmentprocess”,Industrial Marketing Management, Volume 25, Number 6, November1996 pp. 545-553(9)
  • Wustenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, and M.J. Burer, (2007) “Social acceptance ofrenewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept”. Energy Policy,2007. 35(5): p. 2683-2691.
  • Wustenhagen, R., M. Wolsink & M. J. Burer (2007) “Social acceptance ofrenewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept”. Energy Policy,35, 2683-2691.
  • Wolsink, M., (2007) “Wind power implementation: The nature of publicattitudes: Equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'”. Renewable &Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007. 11(6): p. 1188-1207.
  • Williams,R.andEdge,D.(1996),"TheSocialShapingofTechnology"ResearchPolicy,Vol.25,865-899.
  • Wiesenthal, T., A. Mercier, B. Schade, H. Petric & P. Dowling (2012) “Amodel-based assessment of the impact of revitalised R&D investments on theEuropean power sector”. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16,105-112.
  • Whipp, R. (1991) “Managing technological changes. Opportunities and pitfalls”.International Journal of Vehicle Design, 12, 469-477.
  • Wenger, Etienne. "Communities of practice and social learning systems: thecareer of a concept." Social learning systems and communities of practice(2010): 179-198.
  • Weigelt, Carmen. "The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrativecapabilities and performance." Strategic Management Journal 30.6 (2009):595-616.
  • Wang, J. T. & C. Y. Yang (2012) “Flexibility planning for managing R&D projectsunder risk. ”International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 823-831
  • Vigier, Pierre. "Towards a Citizen-driven Innovation System in Europe: Agovernance approach for a European innovation agenda." Innovation 20.3(2007): 191-202.
  • Van der Linden, Review of international experience with renewable energyobligation support mechanisms. Netherlands: Petten; 2005. ECN-C-05-025
  • Van den Ende, J., Kemp, R.(1999). “Technological transformations in history:how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes”, ResearchPolicy, 28, 833?851a.
  • Van de Ven, A. and Garud. R.(1989), "Framework for Understanding theEmergence fo New Industries", Research on Technological Innovation,Management and Policy, Vol. 4, 195-225. JAI Press.
  • Van de Ven, A. and Garud, R. (1993), "Innovation and Industry Development:The Case of Cochlear Implants", Research on Technological Innovation,Management and Policy, Vol. 5, 1-46, JAI Press Inc.
  • Van Der, Gerben S., and J. Stuart Bunderson. "Learning and Performance inMultidisciplinary Teams: The Importance of Collective Team Identification."Academy of Management Journal 48.3 (2005): 532-547.
  • Unruh, G. C.(2000), "Understanding Carbon Lock-in", Energy Policy, 34(10),1185-1197
  • Understanding “strategic learning”: Linking organizational learning, knowledgemanagement, and sensemaking. Organization Science 12.3 (2001): 331-345.
  • Sterrenberg(2013), Low Carbon Transition through system innovation : theoreticalnotions and application, pioneers into practice mentoring program 2013Thomas, James B., Stephanie Watts Sussman, and John C. Henderson.
  • Starbuck, William H., and Bo Hedberg. "14 How Organizations Learn fromSuccess and Failure." Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge(2003): 327.
  • Stankiewicz, R. (1992) “Technology as an autonomous socio-cognitive system.”In: Grupp, H. (Ed.), Dynamics of Science-Based Innovation. Springer?Verlag,Berlin, pp. 19?44.
  • Song, M. & M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2001) “The Effect of PerceivedTechnological Uncertainty on Japanese New Product Development”. TheAcademy of Management Journal, 44, 61-80.
  • Solow, R.M. (1956), "A contribution to the theory of economic growth,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp.65-94
  • Smith, David. Exploring innovation. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010.
  • Smith, A.(2005), “The alternative technology movement: an analysis of itsframing and negotiations of technology development“ Human Ecology Review,12 (2),106?119.
  • Simon, Herbert A. "Rationality in psychology and economics." Journal ofBusiness (1986): S209-S224.
  • Shehabuddeen, N., D. Probert & R. Phaal (2006) “From theory to practice:challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework”. Technovation,26, 324-335.
  • Sethi, Rajesh. "New product quality and product development teams." TheJournal of Marketing (2000): 1-14.
  • Senge, Peter M. "The leader’s new work." Leading organizations (1998):439-457.
  • Schot J.W.(1998), “The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaininginnovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century“ HistTechnol, 14:173?200Schot, J.W. and Geels, F.W.(2008), “Strategic niche management and sustainableinnovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda and policy”, TechnologyAnalysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537-554Schumpeter, J. A. (1947) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, NY, London:Harper&Brothers Publisher.
  • Saban, K., J. Lanasa, C. Lackman, and G.Peace(2000), "Organizational learning：A critical component to new product development," Journal of Product andBrand Management, Vol.2, pp.99-117.
  • STEPI , 한국혁신체제의 동태적 분석과 발전전략, 연구보고서STEPI (2014), 지속가능한 사회기술시스템으로의 전환
    연구보고서 2014-1 [2012]
  • Roberts, Joanne. "Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspectiveon the unknown." Management Learning (2012).
  • R. Mourik, A. D. Groot, H. Jeeninga, “Challenges in the Transition Toward aHydrogen-Based Society: an In-Depth Study to Assess The Potential of aTransition to a Hydrogen-Based Energy Supply in Europe”, InterJEnerCleanEnv.v7. i3. 40 pages 239-254
  • Probert, D. R., R. Phaal & C. J. P. Farrukh (2000) “Development of a structuredapproach to assessing technology management practice”. Proceedings of theInstitution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture,214, 313-321.
  • Phaal, Robert, Clare JP Farrukh, and David R. Probert. "Technologyroadmapping?A planning framework for evolution and revolution."Technological forecasting and social change 71.1 (2004): 5-26.
  • Phaal, Robert, "Strategic roadmapping?Linking Market to technology" CTM,University of Cambridge, 2006
  • Phaal, R., C. J. P. Farrukh & D. R. Probert (2001) “Technology managementprocess assessment: a case study”. International Journal of Operations &Production Management, 21, 1116-1132.
  • Payne, Philip RO, Peter J. Embi, and Chandan K. Sen. "Translational informatics:enabling high-throughput research paradigms." Physiological genomics 39.3(2009): 131-140.
  • Pavitt (1984), “Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxanomy and Theory”,Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373.
  • Patnayakuni, R. & C. P. Ruppel (2010) A socio-technical approach to improvingthe systems development process. Information Systems Frontiers, 12, 219-234.
  • Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan, and Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl. "Designingcollaborative learning contexts." Theory into practice 41.1 (2002): 26-32.
  • Norman, K.(1998) , "Collaboration interactions in support of learning: models,metaphors and management," The digital university: Reinventing the academy.NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 39-53.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: HowJapanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford UniversityPress, USA.
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) “An evolutionary theory of economic change”,Bellknap, Cambridge, MA
  • Mumford, Lewis. The myth of the machine [Vol. 2], The pentagon of power.Harcourt, Brace & World, 1970.
  • Morten Berg Jensen(2007), “Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation”,Research PolicyMuhittin Oral, Ossama Kettani and Pascal Lang (1991) “A methodology forcollective evaluation and selection of industrial r&d projects” ManagementScience vol. 37 no. 7 871-885
  • Morgan, Robert E., and Pierre Berthon. "Market Orientation, GenerativeLearning, Innovation Strategy and Business Performance Inter?Relationships inBioscience Firms." Journal of Management Studies 45.8 (2008): 1329-1353.
  • Metcalfe, J. Stan. Technology and economic development: A comparativeperspective. University of Manchester, Centre for Research on Innovation andCompetition, 2001.
  • Matthews, W. H. (1992) “Conceptual framework for integrating technology intobusiness strategy”. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 13, 524-532.
  • Masakatsu Fujii, Yasuo ikawa, "The development of simplified technology roadmapping for use by japanese chemical companies", PICMET 2008 Proceeding,27-31 July
  • Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.(1993), "Technological Regime and Firm Behavior",Industrial and Corporate Change Vol. 2, No. 1Malerba, Franco. "Sectoral systems of innovation and production." Researchpolicy 31.2 (2002): 247-264.
  • Mah, Ngar-yin (2012), Governing the transition of socio-technical systems : acase study of the development of smart grids in koera, Energy policy 45,133-144
  • Lundvall, B.(1992), “National System of Innovation-Toward a Theory ofInnovation and Interactive Learning”, Research Policy, vol. 24, 2, 320
  • Lundvall, B. (2007), “National Innovation Systems?Analytical Concept andDevelopment Tool”, Industry and Innovation, Volume 14, Issue 1
  • Loorbach, D. (2007), "Governance for sustainability" Editorial ,Sustainability:Science, Practice, &Policy ,Vol 3, Issue 2, pp.1-4.
  • King, Andrew A., and Christopher L. Tucci. "Incumbent entry into new marketniches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation ofdynamic capabilities." Management Science 48.2 (2002): 171-186.
  • Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach (2005) ‘Dutch Policies to Manage the transition toSustainable Energy ', in Jahrbuch Okologische Okonomik 4 Innovationen undNachhaltigkeit, MetropolisVerlag, Marburg, 123-150.
  • Kemp, R. and D. Loorbach (2003), "Governance for Sustainability ThroughTransition Managment", paper for EAEPE 2003 Conference November 7-10,2003 Maastricht, Netherlands. pp. 1- 27.
  • Katz, Ralph. "The effects of group longevity on project communication andperformance." Administrative Science Quarterly (1982): 81-104.
  • Kaplan, Robert S., and Anette Mikes. "Managing risks: A new framework."Harvard Business Review 90.6 (2012): 48-60.
  • Kang & Byun (2001), A Conceptual framework for a web based knowledgeconstruction support system, Educational Technology, 41(4), 48-53
  • Jacobsson, S. and A. Johnson(2000), “The diffusion of renewable energytechnology: an analytical framework and key issues for research”,Energy Policy 28Kaiser, Robert, and Manuel Kripp. "Demand-orientation in national systems ofinnovation: A critical review of current european innovation policy concepts."DRUID Summer Conference on “Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organizationand Technology” at Imperial College London Business School, June. 2010.
  • IEA(2011), Energy Prices & Taxes, 4th Quarter, OECDJaworski and kohli(1993), Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 53-70
  • Huber, George P. "Organizational learning: The contributing processes and theliteratures." Organization science 2.1 (1991): 88-115.
  • Hopkins, M.M., (2006) “Strategic risk management using complementary assets:Organizational capabilities and the commercialization of human genetic testingin the UK”. Research Policy, 2006. 35.
  • Hoetker, G. (2005) “How Much You Know versus How Well I Know You: Selecting aSupplier for a Technically Innovative Component”. Strategic ManagementHoogma, Remco, and Rene Kemp. Experimenting for sustainable transport: theapproach of strategic niche management. Taylor & Francis, 2002.
  • Hall, D.L.(1990) An interactive approach for selecting IR&D projects,Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, May 1990.
  • Gregory, M. J. (1995) “Technology management: a process approach.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers”, Part B: Journal ofEngineering Manufacture, 209, 347-356.
  • Gongla, Patricia, and Christine R. Rizzuto. "Evolving communities of practice:IBM Global Services experience." IBM systems journal 40.4 (2001): 842-862.
  • Goerzen, A. (2007) “Alliance Networks and Firm Performance”: The Impact ofRepeated Partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 487-509.
  • Glasmeier, A. (1991) “Technological discontinuities and flexible productionnetworks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry”. ResearchPolicy, 20, 469-485.
  • Geels, Frank W.(2004), "Understanding system innovations: a critical literaturereview and a conceptual synthesis." System innovation and the transition tosustainability: Theory, evidence and policy 19-47.
  • Geels, F.W. and Raven, R.P.J.M.(2007), “Socio-cognitive evolution andco-evolution in competing technical trajectories: Biogas development inDenmark (1970-2002)”, International Journal of Sustainable Development &World Ecology, 14(1), 63-77
  • Geels, F.W. and R.P.J.M. Raven(2006), “Non-linearity and expectations inniche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development(1973-2003)”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3/4), 375-392
  • Geels, F. W. (2004), "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technicalsystems Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutionaltheory", Research Policy, 33(6-7), pp 897-920
  • Geels F.W. (2002), "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfigurationprocesses: a multi-level perspective and a case-study", Research Policy 31,1257?1274
  • Fisher, Marshall L(1997). "What is the right supply chain for your product?."Harvard business review 75 : 105-117.
  • Fischer, Frank, et al. "Fostering collaborative knowledge construction withvisualization tools." Learning and Instruction 12.2 (2002): 213-232.
  • Farrukh, C., R. Phaal, D. Probert, M. Gregory & J. Wright (2000) “Developing aprocess for the relative valuation of R&D programmes. R & D Management”,30, 43-53.
  • Elzen, B., Geels, F.W and Green, K.(2004), System Innovation and the Transitionto Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Edward Elgar.
  • Edler J. and L. Georghiou(2007), “Public procurement and innovationresur-recting the demand side”, Research Policy 36.
  • EZ(2004), "Innovation in Energy policy : Energy Transition : State of Affairs andthe Way ahead"
  • Dror, Yehekel, “Abstract Theory and common Sense Triviallities: The ModernStudy of Planning", Public Administration Review, Vol. 23, N0. 1, 1963Easterby-Smith, Mark, and Luis Araujo. "Organizational learning: current debatesand opportunities." Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization:Developments in Theory and Practice, Sage, London (1999): 1-21.
  • Dosi, Giovanni. "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: asuggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technicalchange." Research policy 11.3 (1982): 147-162.
  • Donald Liles, Adrien Presley(2000) “R&D validation planning: a methodology tolink technical validations to benefits measurement”,R&D Management, Vol. 30,No. 1Dosi,G.(1988a),"Sources,Procedures,andMicroeconomicEffectsofInnovation"JournalofEconomicLiterature,Vol.26,1120-1171.
  • Dexia Hypothekenbank Berlin AG(2007), Alternative Energies, Equtiy ResearchSector ReportDodgson, Mark, and John R. Bessant. "Effective innovation policy." (1996).
  • Dewar, Robert D., and Jane E. Dutton. "The adoption of radical andincremental innovations: an empirical analysis." Management science 32.11(1986): 1422-1433.
  • Clarysse, B; Wright, M; Mustar,(2009), Behavioural additionality of R&Dsubsidies: A learning perspectiv, P. RESEARCH POLICY; DEC, 2009; 38de Vivero, Juan Luis Suarez, and Inmaculada Martinez Alba(2007). "An exercisein Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind farm in the Gulf ofCadix." Science and Policy Integration for COastal System Assessment, SPICOSADraft Report.
  • CSCL에서 SN(Social Network)데이터의 제시가 상호작용 과정과 활동성과에 미치는 영향
    강인구 김동식 교육공학연구, 20권 1호 [2004]
  • CGE 모형 추정결과를 이용한 국가 R&D 투자 우선순위 설정.
    안승구 임병인 기술혁신연구 19.3 : 57-83 [2011]
  • Bosselman, Fred(2006). "Energy, Economics and the Environment: Cases andMaterials." ENERGY, ECONOMICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: CASES ANDMATERIALS, Foundation Press.
  • Bosch and J. Rotmans. "Deepening, Broadening and Scaling up: a Frameworkfor Steering Transition Experiments. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable SystemInnovations and Transitions (KCT). Delft: Rotterdam University." (2008).
  • Bloor D. (1976), “Knowledge and Social Imagery”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  • Bijker. W.. T. Huges and T. Pinch(eds) (1987) “The Social Construction ofTehcnological Systems”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Bijker,W.,Hughes,TandPinch,T.(eds)(1987),TheSocialConstructionofTechnologicalSystems,MITPress,Cambridge,MA.
  • Bansi Nagji (2012) “Managing your portfolio”, Harvard Business ReviewBhatti, T. 2000. “Justification of manufacturing technology capital investment-anintegrated approach. In Management of Innovation and Technology”, ICMIT2000. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on, 346-353 vol.1.
  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding incollaborative learning tasks. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computationalapproaches, 31-63.
  • BTM Consulting, Wind Energy Update, Offshore Wind Energy Operation andMaintenance, 2011Callon, M.(1987), "Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Toolfor Sociological Analysis", in Bijker et al(1987).
  • Aschhoff, Birgit, and Wolfgang Sofka. "Innovation on demand?Can publicprocurement drive market success of innovations?." Research Policy 38.8 (2009):1235-1247.
  • Arnold and K Guy (1998), ‘Technology diffusion programmes and the challengefor evaluation’, OECD Conference on Policy Evaluation in Innovation andTechnology: Towards Best Practices, June 1997, Paris (OECD).
  • Ancona, Deborah G., and David F. Caldwell (1992). "Bridging the boundary:External activity and performance in organizational teams." Administrativescience quarterly: 634-665.
  • Adler, Paul S., and Seok-Woo Kwon. "Social capital: prospects for a newconcept." Academy of management review 27.1 (2002): 17-40.