연구동향 분석
박사

Assessing the ability of computational thinking for elementary school students

전수진 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 전수진
    • 형태사항 삽화, 도표: 26 cm: ix, 120 p. :
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 李元揆, 부록: Questions for computational thinking[3][57], 참고문헌: p. 104-113
    • 학위논문사항 2015. 2, 學位論文(博士)-, 컴퓨터敎育學科, 高麗大學校 大學院
    • 발행지 Seoul
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 Graduate School, Korea University
    • 주제어 Computational Thinking
    유사주제 논문( 336)
인용/피인용
' Assessing the ability of computational thinking for elementary school students' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • computational thinking
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
337 0

0.0%

' Assessing the ability of computational thinking for elementary school students' 의 참고문헌

  • diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy.The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London
  • Yoo, S., Yeum, Y., Kim, Y., Cha, S., Kim, J., Jang, H. & Lee, W. (2006).Development of an integrated informatics curriculum for K-12 in Korea. InInformatics Education?The Bridge between Using and UnderstandingComputers (pp. 199-208). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Yang, H., Kuo, L., Yang, H., Yu, J., Chen, L.(2009).On-line PBL SystemFlows and User ?s Motivation, WSEAS Transactions on Communications, Issue4, Volume 8.
  • Wing, J. M. (2008), Computational thinking and thinking about computing,Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 366, 3717-3725
  • Wen, J. R., & Shih, W. L. (2008). Exploring the information literacycompetence standards for elementary and high school teachers. Computers &Education, 50(3), 787?806.
  • Vasconcelos, J. (2007). Basic strategy for algorithmic problem solving.Extraido el, 2.
  • Tucker, A. (2003). A Model Curriculum for K--12 Computer Science: FinalReport of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee.
  • Susan Brooks-Young (2007), National Educational Technology Standards forStudents Second Edition, ISTE. Murray, J., & Kinnick, N. C. (2003).Contemporary literacy: Essential skills for the 21st century. MultimediaSchools, 10(2), 14-21.
  • Snyder, L. (2003). Fluency with information technology: Skills, concepts,and capabilities. Addison Wesley.
  • Rubin, D. M. (1996). Introduction to CRC cards. Methodologies andPractices, Soft start Research, Inc.
  • Robertson, J. (2010), How to assess computational thinking?.http://judyrobertson.typepad.com/adventure_author/2010/03/how-to-assesscomputational-thinking.html. Accessed Wednesday, March 03.
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E.,Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B. & Kafai, Y.(2009). Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM, 52(11),60-67.
  • Papert, S. &Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Constructionism,Ablex Publishing Corporation: 193-206. Retrieved fromhttp://www.papert.org/artiCTes/SituatingConstructionism.html.
  • OECD (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? : WhatPISA studies tell us (Program for international student assessment (PISA)).New York: Organization for Economic Press.
  • O'Kelly, J., & Gibson, J. P. (2006). Robo Code& problem-based learning:a non-prescriptive approach to teaching programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,38(3), 217-221.
  • McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., & Fernald, J. (2002). The effectsof pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1), 38-42.
  • MOE (2014). 24 September 2014, announcement of introducing 2015integrated curriculum of liberal arts and natural sciences (elementary middleschool curriculum) ?109
  • MOE (2011). Selective subject curriculum in middle school. Ministry ofEducation and Science Technology No. 2011-361. [Issue 18]. Seoul: Ministryof Education and Science Technology
  • MOE (2007). Curriculum guideline for Middle school (V). Seoul: Ministryof Education and Human Resources Development in KOREA.
  • MOE (2005). Guidelines for information and communications technologyeducation in elementary and secondary schools (Rev. ed.). A special report ofMinistry of Education and Human Resources Development in KOREA.
  • MOE (2000). Guidelines for information and communications technologyeducation in elementary and secondary schools. A special of Ministry ofEducation and Human Resources Development in KOREA
  • MOE & KERIS (2006). Adapting education to the information age. Aspecial report of Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development inKOREA & Korea Education in KOREA & Research Information Service.
  • Lee, O. H.,(1993). Educational meaning and practice direction search ofLOGO programming. Education engineering research, 8(1), 81-102.
  • Lee, J. M., Lee, G., H.,(1998). Cognitive psychological analysis researchon beginners of C language learning course. Research report of the KoreanSociety for Cognitive Science, 1-20.
  • Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., ...&Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads,2(1), 32-37.
  • Lee, E. K., (2009). A task centered scratch programming learning programfor enhancing learner ?s problem solving ability. The Journal of KoreanAssociation of Computer Education, 12(6), 1-9.
  • Kong, S. C. (2008). A curriculum framework on implementing informationtechnology in school education to foster information literacy. Computers &Education, 51(1), 129?141.
  • Kim, S. H., Han, S. K., Kim, H. C. (2010). A study on learner ?scharacteristics and programming skill in computational literacy education ?108Focus on learning style and multiple intelligence. The Journal of KoreanAssociation of Computer Education, 13(2), 15-23.
  • Kim, S. H., & Han, S .G. (2012). Design-Based learning for computationalthinking, Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 16 (3),319-326.106
  • Kim, S. H. (2009). Secondary Education Program for Problem-solving Abilitybased on Computational Thinking, Ph.D. thesis, Korea University.105
  • Kim, S. H, Kim, H. C., Han, H. S., & Han, S. G. (2011). Effect of multipleintelligence-based strategies in computational literacy education. The Journalof Korean Association of Computer Education, 14(6), 11-18.
  • Kim, K.S., Kim, C., Kim, H.B., Jeong, I.K., Jeong, Y.S., Ahn, S.H. & Kim,C.W. (2014) A Study on Contents of Information Science Curriculum. Journalof The Korean Association of Information Education Vol. 18, No. 1,March2014, pp. 161-171
  • Kim, K.S. (2014).Measuring and Applying the Self-efficacy in ComputerProgramming Education, Journal of the Korean Association of InformationEducation, Vol. 18, No.1, March 2014, pp.111-120.
  • KERIS (2010). Assessing students ? ICT literacy at a national level (KR2010-9). A special report of Korea Education & Research Information Service.
  • KERIS (2009). Assessing students ? ICT literacy at a national level (KR2009-15). A special report of Korea Education & Research Information Service.
  • KERIS (2008). Development of an ICT literacy test for junior and seniorhigh school students (KR 2008-4). A special report of Korea Education &Research Information Service.
  • KERIS (2007). Development of a test tool for ICT literacy; elementary school(KR 2007-18). A special report of Korea Education & Research InformationService.
  • KERIS (2005). A model curriculum for integrating computer science andICT curriculum KERIS (KR 2005?29). A special report of Korea Educationand Research Information Service.
  • KERIS (2002). A study on standardization of ICT skill standard forstudents (ISSS) and detailing the curriculum (CR 2002?5). A special report ofKorea Education & Research Information Service.
  • KERIS (2001). Development of ICT skill standard for students (ISSS) andcurriculum of K?12(CR2001-3). Korea Education & Research InformationService. A special report of the ICT literacy research.
  • Jun, S., Kim, S., &Han, S. (2014) Effect of Design-Based Learning forImproving Computational Thinking. Journal of Behaviour & InformationTechnology. In pressed.110
  • Jun, S., Kim, S., & Lee, W. (2010) Teaching Strategy for AlgorithmicProblem-Solving. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education,(11), 371-380.
  • Jun, S., Kim, S., & Lee, W. (2007) Online Pair-Programming for LearningProgramming of Novices. WSEAS Transaction (Sept 2007).
  • Jun, S., Han, S., Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2014). Assessing the computationalliteracy of elementary students on a national level in Korea. The Journal ofEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1-14.
  • Jenkins, T. (2002, August). On the difficulty of learning to program. InProceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Informationand Computer Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 53-58).
  • Honey, M., Meade, T., Brunner, C., Ching, D., CTements, P., &Mandinach, E. (2007). Computational literacy final report: Major research andeducation activities, a final report of center for children and technology.October 1
  • Guzdial, M. (2008). Education ? Paving the way for computationalthinking. Communication of the ACM, 51(8), 25?27.
  • Futschek, G. (2006). Algorithmic thinking: The key for understandingcomputer science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4226, 159?168.
  • Fischer, G. (2005). Computational literacy and fluency: being independentof high-tech scribes. Strukturieren-Modellieren-Kommunizieren. Leitbildmathematischer und informatischer Aktivitaten, Franzbecker, Hildesheim, 217-230.
  • ETS. (2001). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy, areport of the international ICT Literacy Panel. Retrieved July 15, 2006, fromwww.ets.org/ICTliteracy107
  • Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000, November). Developingalgorithmic thinking with Alice. In The Proceedings of ISECON 2000 (Vol. 17,pp. 506-539).
  • Choi, S., Bell, T., Jun, S., & Lee, W. (2008) Designing offline computerscience activities for the Korean elementary school curriculum, Proceedings ofthe 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer scienceeducation, June 30-July 02, Madrid, Spain
  • Choi, H.S. (2014), Developing Lessons and Rubrics to Promote ComputationalThinking , Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, Vol.18, No.1, March 2014, pp.57-64.
  • Central Board of Secondary Education(2005), http://cbse.nic.in/public.htm
  • Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science andtheir implications for science pedagogy: a literature review. InternationalJournal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(4), 193-206. Retrieved fromEBSCOhost.
  • Caitlin Kelleher and Randy Pausch (2005). Lowering the barriers toprogramming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages fornovice programmers, ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 37, 2, pp. 83-137.
  • CAS (2013), Computing in the national curriculum A guide for primaryteachers, London.
  • Brennan, K. (2011), Creative computing, 2012.8.29, URL:http://scratched.media.mit.edu
  • Borstler, J., & Schulte, C. (2005). Teaching object oriented modelling withCRC cards and roleplaying games. Proc. of WCCE 2005.111
  • Bergin, J., Kelemen, C., McNally, M., Naps, T., Goldweber, M., Power,C., & Hartley, S. (2001). Non-programming resources for an introduction toCS: A collection of resources for the first courses in computer science. ACMSIGCSE Bulletin, 33, 89?100.
  • Bergin, J., Kelemen, C., McNally, M., Naps, T., Gold weber, M., Power,C., & Hartley, S. (2001). Non-programming resources for an introduction toCS: a collection of resources for the first courses in computer science. ACMSIGCSE Bulletin, 33(2), 89-100.
  • Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computerscience unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers.The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology,13(1), 20-29.
  • Begel, A., Garcia, D. D., & Wolfman, S. A. (2004, March). Kinestheticlearning in the classroom. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 183-184). ACM.113
  • Beck, K., Cunningham, W. (1989). A Laboratory for Teaching Object-Oriented Thinking. Proceedings OOPSLA ?89. 1-6.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioralchange. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.112
  • Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms and equivalent scores. In R.L.Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.) (pp. 508?600).Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
  • Aiken, J. M., Caballero, M. D., Douglas, S. S., Burk, J. B., Scanlon, E. M.,Thoms, B. D., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Understanding student computationalthinking with computational modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1764.