연구동향 분석
박사

신문 사설에 나타난 입장표지와 개입표지의 시대적 변천에 관한 연구 : 뉴욕타임스 사설을 중심으로 = A Study on the Historical Transition of Stance Markers and Engagement Markers in Newspaper Editorials: with Reference to The New York Times Editorials

전준기 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 신문 사설에 나타난 입장표지와 개입표지의 시대적 변천에 관한 연구 : 뉴욕타임스 사설을 중심으로 = A Study on the Historical Transition of Stance Markers and Engagement Markers in Newspaper Editorials: with Reference to The New York Times Editorials' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 개입표지
  • 사설
  • 상호작용
  • 신문
  • 입장표지
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,266 0

0.0%

' 신문 사설에 나타난 입장표지와 개입표지의 시대적 변천에 관한 연구 : 뉴욕타임스 사설을 중심으로 = A Study on the Historical Transition of Stance Markers and Engagement Markers in Newspaper Editorials: with Reference to The New York Times Editorials' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국과 미국의 신문사설 텍스트 비교: '근거성' 표현을 중심으로
    김용진 사회언어학 7(1),119-149.한국사회언어학회 [1999]
  • 한국과 미국 신문의 인용보도 방식 비교 -한미FTA 보도에 나타난 개입 양상-
    이영희 사회언어학 21(1),185-214.한국사회언어 학회 [2013]
  • 한 미 신문의 취재원 사용 관행 비교 연구 :조선일보와 뉴욕타임스.이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
    김지영 서울 [2008]
  • 신문원론
    임영호 서울:연암사 [2000]
  • 신문 지면의 구성 요소
    박재영 서울:미디어연구소 [2004]
  • 신문 의 언어문화와 미디어 교육
  • 신문 사설의 비교 분석과 EFL 활용방안.
    유현주 한 영 연세대학 교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.서울. [2009]
  • 신문 사설 제목의 사회언어학적 분석
    김용진 사회언어학 11(1),31-54.한국사회언어학회 [2003]
  • 신뢰와 존경을 받는 언론 :취재보도의 이론과 실제
    박석흥 서 울:이담북스 [2009]
  • 미디어 언어의 텍스트 화용론
    이성만 서울:도서출판 경진 [2012]
  • 미국신문사
    차배근 서울:서울대학교출판부 [1983]
  • 미국과 언론
    이상철 서울:일지사 [1993]
  • 모더니즘과 포스트모더니즘
    김욱동 서울:현암사 [2004]
  • 매스미디어와 정보사회
    배규한 서 울:커뮤니케이션북스 [2004]
  • 매스미디어와 사회
    최정호 서울:나남출판사 [1990]
  • 담화분석:방법론 및 사회언어학적 연구의 실례
    이원표 서울:한 국문화사 [2002]
  • 뉴스 보도에 나타난 보도자의 개입 양상:뉴욕타임스 1면 기사를 중심으로.
    이영희 숭실대학교 영어영문학과 박사학위 논문.서울. [2008]
  • 국제박람회 역사와 일본의 경험
    히라노 시게오미 서울:커뮤니 케이션북스 [2011]
  • “신문 사설에 나타나는 어휘 사용의 추이:물결 21코퍼스를 활용하여.”
    강범모 김혜영 텍스트언어학 35,1-22.한국텍스트언어 학회 [2013]
  • “독자를 텍스트에 개입시키기 위한 장치로서 사용된 영어 인칭대명사 YOU와 WE에 관한 연구:신문의 과학 특집 기사에 나타난 예를 중심으로.”
    김철규 비교문화연구 10(1),1-20.경희대학교 비교문화연구소 [2006]
  • Westin,I.(2002).Language change in English newspapereditorials. Amsterdam:Rodopi.
  • Webber,P.(1994).The function of questions in different medical Englishgenres.EnglishforSpecificPurposes,13,257-68.
  • Van Dijk,T.A.(1998).Opinions and ideologies in the press.In P. Garrettand A.Bell(Eds.),Approaches to media discourse, (pp.21?63).Blackwell:Oxford.
  • Van Dijk,T.(1996).Opinionsand ideologiesin editorials.Paperfor the 14th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis:Language,SocialLifeandCriticalThought.Athens, 14-16,December1995.
  • Tracy, S. (2002). When questioning turns to face threat: An interactionalsensitivity in911call-taking.WesternJournalof Communication,66,129-157.
  • Thompson,G.andHunston,S.(2000).Evaluation:Anintroduction.In S.Hunston and G.Thompson (Eds.),Evaluation in text: Authorialstanceandtheconstructionofdiscourse,(pp.1-27). Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Thompson,G.(2001).Interaction in academic writing:Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. London:Routledge.
  • Thompson, G. and Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one hand clapping:themanagementofinteraction in written discourse. Text,15(1),103-127.
  • Tannen,D.(1989).Talking voices:Repetition,dialogue,andimagery in conversationaldiscourse.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Tang,R.and John,S.(1999).The ‘I’in identity:Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through first person pronoun.EnglishforSpecificPurposes,18,23-39.
  • Swan,M.(2005).PracticalEnglish usage.(3rd ed.).Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Stonecipher,H.(1979).Editorial and persuasive writing: Opinion functions ofthe news media.New York: Hastings House Publishers.
  • Sloan,W.D.andParcell,L.M.(2002).Americanjournalism:History, principles,practices.Jefferson,N.C.:McFarland& Co.
  • Sigal,V.(1973).Reportersand officials.Lexington,MA:D.C.Heath andCompany.
  • Selzer,J.(1991).Conversations: Readings for writing.New York: Macmillan.
  • Schudson,M.(1978).Discovering the news: A social history of Americannewspapers.New York:BasicBooks.
  • Quirk, R, Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.(1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
  • Philips,S.(1993).Evidentiary standardsforAmerican trials:Justthe facts.In Hill,J.and.Irvine,J.(Eds.),Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, (pp. 248-259). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Perkins,M.(1983).Modalexpressions in English.London:Frances Pinter.
  • Pauly, J. J. (2014). The new journalism and the struggle for interpretation.Journalism,15(5),589-604.
  • Palmer, F. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • O’Donnel,M.(2012).Introductiontosystemicfunctionallinguisticsfor discourseanalysis.UniversidadAut nomadeMadrid.
  • Ogan,C.,Plymale,I.,Smith D.L.,Turpin,H.,and Shaw,D.L. (1975).The changing frontpage ofThe New York Times, 1900-1970,Journalism Quarterly,52,340-344.
  • Ochs,E.andSchieffelin,B.(1989).Languagehasaheart.Text,9(1), 7-25.
  • Nystrand,M.(1989).A social-interactive modelofwriting.Written Communication,6,66?85.
  • Nystrand,M.(1986).Thestructureofwrittencommunication:Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando and London:AcademicPress.
  • Myers,G.(1999).Interaction in writing:Principles and problems.In C.N.CandlinandK.Hyland(Eds.),Writing:text,processes, andpractices,(pp.40-61).Harlow:AddisonWesleyLongman.
  • Myers,G.(1989).Thepragmatics ofpolitenessin scientific articles. AppliedLinguistics,10,1-35.
  • Mushin,I.(2001).Evidentialityand epistemologicalstance:Narrative retelling.Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.
  • Mott,F.L.(1941).American journalism:A historyofnewspapersin the United States through 250 years 1690-1940.New York: Macmillan.
  • May, J. (1989). Questions as suggestions: The pragmatics of interrogative speech. Language and Communication, 9(4), 227-243.
  • Lee,N.I.(2009).Stance and engagementin writing:Japanese and American editorials.InV.K.Bhatia,W.Cheng,B.Du-Babcok andJ.Lung (Eds.),Languageforprofessionalcommunication: Research,practice& training,(pp.61-70).CityUniversityof HongKong,Asia-PacificLSPandProfessionalCommunication Association,TheHongKongPolytechnicUniversity.
  • Lee, N. I. (2011). Academic and journalistic writing in English and Japanese:A contrastive study on stance and engagement expressions. Journal ofModern Languages, 21, 59-71.
  • Lakoff,G.(1972).Hedges:A study in meaning criteriaandthelogic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lagonikos,I.T.(2005).Ideology in editorials: A comparison of selected editorials in English-medium newspapers after september11.Ph.D.dissertation,RhodesUniversity.
  • Labov,W.(1984).Intensity.InD.Schiffrin(Ed.),Meaning,form,and use in context: Linguistic applications, (pp. 43-70). Washington,DC:GeorgetownUniversityPress.
  • Kuhi, D., Tofigh, M., and Babaie, R. (2013). Writers’ self-representationinacademicwriting:Thecaseofcomputer engineering research articles by English versus Iranian writers. International Journal of Research Studies in LanguageLearning,2(3),35-48.
  • Kim,C.K.(2006).Writer-readerinteractioninsciencepopularisations: A corpus-based cross-culturalstudy ofwriters’management oftextualinteraction with readers in English and Korean science popularisation discourse. Ph. D. dissertation, UniversityofLiverpool.U.K.
  • Ivanic,R.(1998).Writing andidentity:Thediscoursalconstructionof identityinacademicwriting.Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.
  • Hyland,K.(2008).Persuasion,interaction and the construction of knowledge:Representing selfand others in research writing. InternationalJournalofEnglishStudies,8(2),8-18.
  • Hyland,K.(2005b).Stanceandengagement:A modelofinteractionin academicdiscourse.DiscourseStudies,7(2),173?192.
  • Hyland,K.(2001b).Humbleservants ofthediscipline? Self-mention in research articles.EnglishforSpecificPurposes,20(3),207 ?226.
  • Hyland,K.(2001a).Bringing in the reader:Addressee features in academicwriting.WrittenCommunication,18(4),549-574.
  • Hyland,K.(1999).Disciplinary discourses:Writerstancein research articles.In C.Candlin and K.Hyland (Eds.),Writing:Texts, processes,andpractices,(pp.99-121).London:Longman.
  • Hyland,K.(1998a).Boosting,hedgingandthenegotiationofacademic knowledge.Text,18(3),349-382.
  • Hyland,K.(1996).Talking to the academy:Forms ofhedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281.
  • Hyland,K.(1994).Hedging in academicwriting and EAP textbooks. EnglishforSpecificPurposes,13(3),239-256.
  • Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London:Continuum.
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academicwriting.AnnArbor:UniversityofMichiganPress.
  • Hyland, K. (2002). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing.Text,22(4),529-557.
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academicwriting.London:Longman.
  • Hyland, K. (1998b). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.
  • Holmes,J.(1988).Doubtand certainty in ESL textbooks.Applied Linguistics,9(1),20-44.
  • Hoey,M.P.(2001).Textualinteraction:An introduction to written discourseanalysis.London& New York:Routledge.
  • Hoey,M.P.(1983).On the surface ofdiscourse.London:George Allen& Unwin.
  • Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Grice,H.P.(1975).Logic and conversation.In P.Cole and J.L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics,3,(pp.41-58).New York:AcademicPress.
  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior.New York:DoubledayAnchor.
  • Friedman, V. (1986). Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian,and Albanian.In WallaceL.Chafeand Johanna Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology,(pp.168-187).Norwood:Ablex.
  • Frank,J.(1990).You callthat a rhetoricalquestion?:Forms and functionsofrhetoricalquestionsinconversation.InJournalof Pragmatics,14,723-738.
  • Fowler,R.(1991).Languageinthenews:Discourseand ideologyin thepress.London:Routledge.
  • Fairclough,N.(1995).Criticaldiscourseanalysis:Thecriticalstudyof language.London:Longman.
  • Faber, B. (1996). Rhetoric in competition: The formation of organizationaldiscoursein Conferenceon CollegeComposition and Communication abstracts. Written Communication, 13, 355-384.
  • Davis,E.(1921).HistoryofTheNew YorkTimes,1851?1921.New York:GreenwoodPressPublishers.
  • Dane?,F.(1994).Involvementwithlanguageandinlanguage.Journal ofPragmatics,22,251-264.
  • Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetoricalact.New York:PeterLangPublishers.
  • Coulthard,M.(1985).Anintroductiontodiscourseanalysis.(2nded.). London:Longman.
  • Conrad,S.and Biber,D.(2000).Adverbialmarking of stance in speech and writing.In S.Hunston and G.Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text:Authorialstance and the construction of discourse,(pp.56-73).Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner’s English Dictionary. (2003). London:Routledge.
  • Chafe,W.L.and Danielewicz,J.(1987).Properties ofspoken and written language. In R. Horowitz and J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oraland written language,(pp.83-113).San Diego:AcademicPress.
  • Chafe,W.L.(1982).Integrationandinvolvementinspeaking,writing and oralliterature.In D.Tannen (Ed.),Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, (pp. 35-54). Norwood,NJ:Ablex.
  • Chafe, W. L. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.In W.L.Chafe and J.Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, (pp. 261-272).Norwood,NJ:Ablex.
  • Brown,P.andLevinson,S.D.(1987).Politeness:Someuniversalsin languageusage.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Bol var,A.(1996).The discourse of British newspaper editorials. LABSA Journal,1(1),75-79.
  • Bol var,A.(1994).The structure of newspaper editorials.In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis, (pp. 276-294).London:Routledge.
  • Bol var,A.(1986).Interaction through written text: A discourse analysis of newspaper editorials. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation,UniversityofBirmingham.
  • Biber,D.andFinegan,E.(1989).StylesofstanceinEnglish:Lexical and grammaticalmarking of evidentiality and affect.Text, 9(1),93?124.
  • Biber,D.and Finegan,E.(1988).Adverbialstancetypesin English. DiscourseProcesses,11,1-34.
  • Biber,D.,Johansson,S.,Leech,G.,Conrad,S.,and Finegan,E. (1999).Longman grammar ofspoken and written English. London:Longman.
  • Biber,D.(2004).Historicalpatterns forthe grammaticalmarking of stance:A cross-register comparison.JournalofHistorical Pragmatics,5,107-135.
  • Biber,D.(1988).Variation across speech and writing.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.
  • Bennett, L. (1996). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
  • Bell,A.(1991).Thelanguageofnewsmedia.Oxford:Blackwell.
  • Barnhurst,K.G.andNerone,J.(2001).Theform ofnews:A history. New York:TheGuilfordPress.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin:UniversityofTexasPress.
  • Bagdikian,B.(1983).Themediamonopoly.Boston.MA:Beacon.
  • Ansary,H.andE.Babaii.(2004).Thegenericintegrity ofnewspaper editorials: A systemic functional perspective. Asian EFL Journal,6(1),1-58.