연구동향 분석
박사

A Phenomenological Study of Korean Elementary English Teachers Sense of Professionalism

김형태 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' A Phenomenological Study of Korean Elementary English Teachers Sense of Professionalism' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • elementary english teacher's professionalism
  • identity fallacy
  • island fallacy
  • native speaker fallacy
  • phenomenological study
  • values in english teaching
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
306 0

0.0%

' A Phenomenological Study of Korean Elementary English Teachers Sense of Professionalism' 의 참고문헌

  • Yoon, J-K. (2002). The oppression of English: its origin and structures. Angwabak, 12, 10-32.
  • Yoon, J -K. (2001). Yeongeo, nae mauemeui sikminjueui (English, colonialism in my mind). Sahoibipyeong, 18, 110-126.
  • Yim, S-Y. (2014). Development of an affective scale to measure primary English teachers’ professionalism. English Teaching, 69(2), 221-246.
  • Wu, A., Liang, J. & Csepelyi, T. (2010). Coping strategies for NNES teachers’ development. In Mahboob, A. (Ed.), The NNEST lens: nonnative English speakers in TESOL (pp.202-221). UK: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Linguistic foundation for language teaching. EFL Gazette: June.
  • Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher Professionalism in New Times. Journal of In - Service Education. 26(2), 281-295.
  • Wertz, F. (2005). Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 167-177.
  • Webb, R., Vullianmy, G., Hamalainen, S., Sarja, A., Kimomen, E., & Nevelainen, R. (2004). A comp arative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in England and Finland. Compariative Education, 40(1), 83-107.
  • Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenolgy & Practice, 1(1), 11-30.
  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for anaction sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: The University ofWestern Ontario.
  • Valle, R., King, M., & Halling, S. (1989). An introduction to existential - phenomenological thought in psychology. In R. Valle & S. Halling(Ed.), Existential-phenomenological perspective in psychology (pp. 3-16). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ur. P. (2002). The English te acher as professional. In Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp.388-392). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsui, Amy B. M. (2009). Teaching expertise: approaches, perspectives and characteristic. In Burns, A & Richards, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 190 -197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsui, Amy B. M. (2005). Expertise in Teaching: perspectives and Issues. In Johnson, K. (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 167-189). New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.
  • Tichenor, M. S., & Tichenor, J. M. (2005). Understanding teachers' perspectives on professionalism. Professional Educator, 27(1-2), 89- 95.
  • Szklarski, A. (2011). Pupils’ experience of being motivated to learn in school: An empirical phenomenological study. Teaching Science, 57(1), 43-50.
  • Svensson, L. G. (2006). New professionalism, trust and competence some conceptual remarks and empirical data. Current s ociology, 54(4), 579-593.
  • Squires, G. ( 1999). Teaching as a Professional Discipline . Philadelphia: Falmer Press
  • Song, H -S. (2013, July, 23). Hyeonjang report 2013 -Hakgyoleul ddeona yeongeo ( Field repor t 2013, English out of school). Kyunghyang Shinmum
  • Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2007). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.
  • Sim, C-Y. (2012). A comparative study of effects based on the types of intensive elementary English teacher training program. Primary English Education, 18(1), 83-106.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  • Shin, H. (2007). English language teaching in Korea. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 75-86). Springer US.
  • Shepard, J. H. (1973). Techonology, division of labor and alienation. Pacific sociological review, 16(1), 61-88.
  • Selvi, A. F. (2011). Key concepts in ELT: the non -native speaker teacher. ELT Journal, 65(2), 187-189.
  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences . New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Samimy, K., & Brutt -Griffler, J. (1999). To be a native or non -native speaker: perceptions of “non-native” students in a graduate TESOL program. In Braine, G. (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 127-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.'
  • Sahin, A. E. (2010). Professional Status of Elementary Teaching in Turkey: a Delphi study. Teachers and Teaching: th eory and practice , 16(4), 437-459.
  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Ryu, S -H. (2000). The academic nature and exploratory area of the elementary pedagogy. The Journal of E lementary Education, 13(2), 181-203.
  • Richardson, V., & Fallona, C. (2001). Classroom management as method and manner. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 705-728.
  • Richards, J. C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching . New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reves, T., & Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native English speaking EFL/ESL teacher’s self-image: an international survey. System, 22, 353-367.
  • Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker ’: expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. EFL Journal, 44, 97-101.
  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Phelps, P. H. (2006). The three Rs of professionalism. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(2), 69-71.
  • Penner, J. L., & McCllement, S. E. (2008). Using phenomenology to examine the experiences of family caregivers of patients with advanced head and neck cancer: Reflections of a novice researcher. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2), 92-101.
  • Park, S-W., & Pakr, C -H. (2009). A case study on teacher professionalism perceived by teachers in attached primary school of Busan national Univ. of education. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22 (3), 1- 22.
  • Park, N-G. (2000). Analysis of elementary school teaching job in the point of professionalism. The Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 239-254.
  • Park, C -D. (2007). Character educati on and teaching profession: Implications for the status of teachers in the primary education. The journal of Elementary Education, 20(3), 107-127.
  • Osguthorpe, R. D. (2008). On the reasons we want teachers of good disposition and moral character. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 288-299.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). Teacher demand and supply. Paris: OECD Center for Educational Research and Innovation.
  • Onions, C. (1996). The Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia -Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.
  • No,G.H.(2006).WorldEnglishandtheeffectiveEnglishteacherin elementary schools.Primary English Education,12(1), 5-33.
  • Nemtchinova, E., Nahboob, A., Eslami, Z., & Dogancay -Aktuna, S. (2010). Training non -native English speaking TESOL professionals. In Mahboob, A. (Ed.), The NNEST lens: nonnative English speakers in TESOL (pp. 222-238). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Na, Y-H, Ahn, B-K, & Kim, H -S. (2008). Evaluating an in -service English teacher training program from mult iple perspectives. English Teaching, 63(4), 273-302.
  • Murdoch, G. (1994). Language development provisions in teacher training curricula. ELT Journal, 48(3), 253-265.
  • Munhall, P. (1989). Philosophical ponderings on qualitative research methods in nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2 (1), 20-28.
  • Moussu, L., & Lluurda, E. (2008). Non -native English -speaking English language teachers: history and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315-348.
  • Melville, W. S. (2005). Professional learning in a school-based community of science teachers. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R?func=dbin-jump- full&object_id=16182
  • Medgyes, P., & Benke, E. (2005). Difference s in teaching behavior between native and nonnative speaker teachers: as seen by the learner. In Llurde, E. (Ed.), Non-native language teachers ’ perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp.195- 215). New York: Springer.
  • Medgyes, P. (2001). When the teacher is a non -native speaker. In M. Celce- Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language . Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
  • Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46(4), 340- 349.
  • Maum, R. (2002). Nonnative -English -speaking teachers in the English teaching profession. ERIC Digest.
  • Matsuda, A., & Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Autonomy and collaboration in teacher education: journal sharing among native and nonnative English-speaking teachers. CATESOL Journal, 13(1), 109-121.
  • Mahoob, A. (2010). The NNEST lens: non-native English speakers in TESOL. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Mahboob, A. (2006). Toward a familiarity-based approach to language proficiency. The NNEST Newsletter of the nonnative English speakers in TESOL Caucus, 8(1).
  • Mahboob, A. (2005). Beyond the native speaker in TESOL. Culture, Context & Communication, 60-93.
  • Mahboob, A. (2004). Native or non-native: What do the students think? In L. D. Kamhi -Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience: perspectives on nonnative English-speaking professionals. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  • MEST (Ministry of Education, Science, and Techonology). (2009). Chodeunghakgyo Gyouk Goijeong Haeseol : oegukeo(yeongeo) ( Explanation on Elementary Curriculum : F oreign language(English)). Seoul: Hansol.
  • MEST (Ministry of Education, Science, and Techonology). (2009). Chodeunghakgyo Gyouk Go ijeong Haeseol ( Explanation on Elementary Curriculum). Seoul: Hansol.
  • Lowenberg, P. H. (1993). Issues of validity in tests of English as a world language: whose standards? World Englishes, 12(1), 95-106.
  • Llurda, E. (Ed.). (2005). Non-native language teachers: perceptions, challenges, and contributions to the profession. New York: Springer. Locke, T. (2001). Questions of professionalism. Change:Transformation in Education, 4(2), 30-50.
  • Lingard, B. (2009). Pedagogizing teacher professional identities. In Gewirtz, S. (Eds.). (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp.81-93). New York: Routledge.
  • Liang, J. (2005). Second language competence: native speaker competence or user competence?. NNEST Newsletter, 7(2).
  • Leiter, J. (1981), Perceived Teacher Autonomy and the Meaning of Organizational Control. The Sociological Quarterly, 22: 225-239.
  • Lee, S-H., & Chung, H-Y. (2012). A study of changes in elementary school teachers’ perception of the English teaching profession during an in - depth EFL staff development program. Gyoyuk Gwahak Yeongu, 43(3), 85-104
  • Lee, S -R. (2004). The empire of English and the politics of English education. Bigyo Munhak, 33, 323-338.
  • Lee, K-J., Choi, J-Y., &, Jan, S-H. (2009). The analysis of the level and its difference by teaching career of elementary teachers’ core competencies. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(3), 219-240.
  • Lee, E -H. (2007). Enlgish village and relocating reality. Hankuk eollon Hakbo, 51(4), 85-110.
  • Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of histor ical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3).
  • Langdridge, D. (2008). Phenomenology and critical social psychology: Directions and debates in theory and research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1126-1142.
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon: Oxford.
  • Koh, J-C. (2001). An exploration on the professionalism of the elementary school teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 14(2), 159-179.
  • Kim, T-G. (2010, January, 27). Robots to replace native English teachers. Koreatimes.
  • Kim, S-H. (2010). A review of the recent teacher education research in Korea. English Language Teaching, 22(1), 273-294.
  • Kim, S -J. (2008). Television discourse on English education; narrative analyses of twelve current -affairs documentaries. Hankuk Bangsong Hakbo, 22(5), 7-25.
  • Kim, S -H. (2004). A flow and alienation appeared on school life of a departmental teachers in elementary school. The Journal of Korean Education, 31(4), 27-51.
  • Kim, N-S. (2006). Yeongeo Gyosaleul wihan In-service training program yeongu hyeonhwanggwa gaeseon bangan (The current state and improvement plan of in -service training program for English teacher). The Korea Association of Teachers of English, 5 th SIG proceeding, 33- 37.
  • Kim, J-R. (2005). Toward Korean immersion of English education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10, 23-40.
  • Kim, H-K. (2011). Native speakerism affecti ng nonnative English teachers ’ identity formation: a critical perspective. English Teaching, 66(4), 53-71.
  • Kim, E-J. (2008a). An exploratory study of curricula in English teacher (pre- service and in -service) training programs for primary and secondary schools in Korea. English Teaching, 63(2), 261-281.
  • Kim, B -S. & Im, J -Y. (2014). A study on the schemes for elevating instruction specialties through subject PCK. Journal of Learner - Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(5), 1-23.
  • Kim, A -Y. (2012). Teacher efficacy: The key f actor of teacher professionalism. The Korean Journal of Education Psychology, 26 (1), 63-84.
  • Kedzior, M., & Fifield, S. (2004). Teacher professional development. Education Policy Brief, 15(21), 76-97.
  • Kang, H-K. (2008, January 30), Korea dreams of becoming Asia No.1 in English-speaking. Koreatimes.
  • Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2000). Adapting U.S. -based TESOL education to meet the needs of non-native English speakers. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 10-14.
  • Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (1999). Preparing non -native professionals in TESOL: implications for teacher education programs. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non- native educators in English language teaching (pp. 145-158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jones, R. S. (2013). Education reform in Korea. OECD.
  • Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English Language Teaching . NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoyle, E. , & Wallace, M. (2005). Educational Leadership: Ambiguity, Professionals and Managerialism. London: Sage.
  • Hegarty, S. (2000). Teaching as a Knowledge-based Activity. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3&4), 451 - 465.
  • Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4 th Ed.). Essex: Pearson Longman.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Lo, L. N. (2000). The paradoxical profession: Teaching at the turn of the century. Prospects, 30(2), 167-180.
  • Ha, M -A., & Min, C -K. (200 8). The constituents of English teachers’ professional competency in EFL context. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 7(2), 87-110.
  • Golombeck, P. (2009). Personal practical knowledge in L2 teacher education. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education , (pp. 155 -162). New York, NY: Cambridge.
  • Golombeck, P. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 447-464.
  • Giorgi,A.(1997).Thetheory,practice,andevaluationofthephenomenologicalmethodasaqualitativeresearchprocedure.JournalofPhenomenologicalPsychology,28(2),235-260.
  • Giorgi, A. (2008). Concerning a serious misunderstanding of the essence of the phenomenological method in psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 39, 33-58.
  • Giorgi, A. (2007). Concerning the phenomenological methods of Husserl and Heidegger and their application in psychology. Collection du Cirp, 1, 63-78.
  • Giorgi, A. (1989). One type of analysis of descriptive data: Procedures involved in following a phenomenological method. Methods, 1, 39- 61.
  • Garza, G (2007) Varieties of phenomenological research at the University of Dallas, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4(4), 313-342.
  • Futernick, K. (2007). A possible dream: Retaining California teachers so all students learn. Sacramento: California State University. Retrieved from http://www. Cakstae.edu/teacherquality/documents/possible_dream.pdf
  • Freud, A. (1996). The ego and the mechanisms of defense . New York: International Universities Press.
  • Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. Language Teaching, 35, 1-13.
  • Fischer, Constance, T., Eckenrod, J., Embree, S. M., & Jarzynka, J. F. (2001). Empirical phenomenological research in psychotherapy: Duquesne dissertations. Psychologische Beit rage, 43(3), 169-178.
  • Fischer, C. T. (1998). Phenomenological, existential, and humanistic foundations for psychology as a human science. In M. He rsen & A. Bellack (Eds.), Comprehensive clinical psychology, Vol.1: Foundations (pp. 449-472). London: Elsevier Science.
  • Finlay, L. (2009). Debating Phenomenological Research Methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6-25.
  • Finlay, L. (2008). Introducing phenomenological research. Retrieved from http://www. google. ca/search.
  • Enever, J., & Moon, J. (2009). New global contexts for teaching Primary ELT: change and challenge. In J. Enever, J. Moon and U. Raman (Eds.), Young Learner English Language Policy and Implementation: International Perspectives (pp. 521). Reading: Garnet Education.
  • Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209- 224.
  • Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowled ge. Language Learning, 54(2), 281-318.
  • Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1994). Teaching conversational skills intensively: Course content and rationale. ELT Journal, 48, 40-49.
  • Dierking, R. C., & Fox, R. F. (2013). Changing the way I teach: Building teacher knowledge, confidence, and au tonomy. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 129-144.
  • Demirkasımolu, N. (2010). Defining “Teacher Professionalism” from different perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , 9, 2047-2051.
  • Day, C., Flores, M. A., & Viana, I. (2007). Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England. European Journal of Teacher Ed ucation, 30(3), 249-265.
  • David, C. (2000). Professionalism and Ethics in Teaching. London: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.
  • Dailey, A. (2010). Difficulties Implementing CLT in South Korea: Mismatch between the language policy and what is taking pl ace in the classroom. UK: University of Birmingham. Retrieved from http://www. birmingham. ac. uk/Documents/college -artslaw/cels/ essays/sociolinguistics/ADaileyDifficultiesImplementingCLTinSouth Korea2. pdf.
  • Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. In J. Cummins & N. J. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd Ed.), Vol.5: Bilingual education (pp. 65-75). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Coulter, D., & Orme, L. (2000). Teacher Professionalism: The Wrong Conversation. Education Canada, 40(1), 4-7.
  • Cook, V. (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209.
  • Conroy, S. A. (2008). A pathway for interpretive phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 36-62.
  • Cone, T. P. (2009). In the moment: Honoring the teaching and learning lived experience; the most exciting and fulfilling teaching moments often fall outside the planned tasks of a lesson. LOPERD, 78(4), 35-41
  • Collins, S. G. (2005). Who’s this Tong-il?: English, culture and ambivalence in South Korea. Changing English, 12(3), 417-429
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connellly, F. M. (1995). Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Landscape. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Chung, H-Y. (2002). A study on the improvement plan of the elementary teacher education programs for the profess ionalism of the elementary school teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 15(2), 425-456.
  • Choi, S -B. (2004). Hanguk sahoeseo Yeongeosillyeoke daehan munhwajabonlonjeok gochal - daehaksaengdeului yeongeohakseub siltaewa yeongeoneunglyukjae daehan insikeul jungsimeuro (Study on English ability in Korea society with the perspective of cultural capital - focus on English learning attitudes of university students, and on perceptions of advanced English speakers). Sahoigoahaknonschong, 5~21.
  • Chavez, M. (2003). The diglossic foreign language classroom: learners’ view on L1 and L2 function. In C. Blyth (Ed.). The sociolinguistic of foreign language classrooms: contributions of the native, the near - native and the non -native speakers (pp. 1-13). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Chang, K-S. (2012). Communication-oriented English education policy and curriculum reform. Journal of the Korea English Education Society , 11(1), 3-23.
  • Chang, K -S. (2008). A study on the curriculum for training preservice primary English teachers. Primary English Education, 14(1), 5-37.
  • Chang, K -S. (2007). Evaluating of inten sive in -service English teacher training programs. Foreign Language Education, 14(3), 257-282
  • Chang, B -M. (2011). The roles of English language education in Asian context. Journal of Pan -Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics , 15(1), 191-206.
  • Carless, D. (2006). Good practices in team teaching in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong. System, 34(3), 341-351.
  • Canagarajah, S. A. (2005). Reclaiming the local in langu age policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Canagarajah, S. A. (1999). Interrogating t he “native speaker fallacy”: nonlinguistic roots, non-pedagogical results. In Braine, G. (Ed.), Non- native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Campbell, E. (2003). The ethical teacher . Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Bygate, M. (2005). Oral second language abilities as expertise. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 104- 125). NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Butler, Y. G. (2004). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245-277.
  • Burns, A. , & J. C. Richards . (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brutt-Griffler, J. , & Samimy. K. (1999). Revisiting the colonial in the postcolonial: Critical praxis for nonnative -English-speaking teachers in a TESOL program. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 413-432.
  • Brutt-Griffler, J. (1998). Conceptual questions in English as a world language:Taking up an issue. World Englishes, 17(3), 381-392.
  • Brutt-Griffler, J. & Samimy. K. (2001). Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes, 20(1), 99-106.
  • Brock, A. (2006). Dimentions of Early Years Professionalims - Attitudes versus Competence? Retrieved from http://www.tactyc.org.uk/pdfs/Reflection-brock.pdf.
  • Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in -service teacher edu cation on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39(3), 370-380.
  • Blyth, C. (1995). Redefin ing the boundaries of language use: the foreign language classroom as a multilingual speech community. In C. Kramsch (Ed.). Redefining the boundaries of language study (pp. 145-183). Boston, MA: Heinle.
  • Biesta, G. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers ’ professional judgment. In Gewirtz, S. (Eds.). (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 184 -193). New York: Routledge.
  • Bernat, E. (2008). Towards a pedagogy of empowerment: the case of ‘impostor syndrome’ among pre-service non-native speaker teachers in TESOL. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 11, 1-8.
  • Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. & Vermunt, J. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teachers and Teacher Education, 16, 749- 764.
  • Barber, B. (1965). Some Problems in the Sociology of the Professions. In K. S. Lynn (Eds.), The Professions in America (pp. 669-688). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Bang, J. (2013). The exploration of Korean elementary English teachers’ perceptions on a short -term oversea training program. Journal of Language Science, 20(4), 55-77.
  • Baggini, J. (2005). What professionalism means for teachers t oday? Education Review, 18(2), 5-11.
  • Astor, A. (2000). A qualified nonnative English-speaking teacher is second to none in the field. TESOL Matters, 10(2), 19.
  • Arva, V. & P. Medgyes. (2000) . Native and non -native teachers in the classroom. System, 28, 355-372.
  • Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language awareness, 12(2), 81-95.
  • Ahn, S-K., &, Yu, Y-W. (2004). A study on the current and improvements of departmentalized instructional system in the elementary school. The Journal of Korean Education Forum, 3(1), 97-122.
  • Ahn, S -H. (2014). English teachers qualifications and environmental conditions for Yungbokhap education: Focus group interviews of primary and secondary school teachers. Teacher Education Research, 53(2), 362-379.