연구동향 분석
박사

연구생산성 결정 요인 : BK21플러스 참여교수를 중심으로 = Determinants of Research Productivity: A Korean Case

김기형 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 김기형
    • 형태사항 vii, 142 p.: 26 cm: 삽화
    • 일반주기 한남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다, 지도교수: 설성수, 참고문헌: p. 117-125
    • 학위논문사항 경제학과, 2015. 2, 학위논문(박사)-, 한남대학교 대학원
    • DDC 330, 23
    • 발행지 대전
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 한남대학교 대학원
    유사주제 논문( 0)
인용/피인용

' 연구생산성 결정 요인 : BK21플러스 참여교수를 중심으로 = Determinants of Research Productivity: A Korean Case' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국과학자의 경력초기 생산성과 인정의 결정 요인들: 대학원 위신과 지도교수 후광효과의 영향을 중심으로
    김명심 박희제 한국사회학, 45(5): 105-142 [2011]
  • 정부의 연구비 지원이 대학 연구자의 논문성과에 미치는 영향 분석
    양정모 장덕희 한동성 한승환 한국행정학보, 42(4): 265-290 [2008]
  • 정부의 연구기반 구축사업이 교원의 연구성과에 미친 영향: 1단계 BK21사업 물리학 분야 SCI급 연구성과의 사례
    남궁근 최인엽 한국정책과학학회보, 14(3): 1-28 [2010]
  • 이공학계열 대학교수의 인적/ 학문적 배경특성과 연구 생산성
    한국과학재단 충남대 박사학위 논문 [1993]
  • 이공계대학 연구경쟁력 살리기
    송충한 서울: 고대 출판부 [2003]
  • 이공계 정부출연연구기관의 연구생산성제고를 위한 기관 고유사업 성과평가 모형 설계및 활용방안
    최재철 서울: 과학기 술정책연구원 [2004]
  • 이공계 대학교수의 연구생산성 영향요인 분석
    류희숙 배종태 기술혁신연구, 5(1): 44-66 [1997]
  • 기술혁신론
    설성수 서울: 법문사 [2011]
  • 「인력양성사업 분석과 향후 추진방향에 관한 연구- 한국연구재단 지원사업을 중심으로」
    설성수 대전: 한국연구재단 [2012]
  • 「대학 연구활동 실태조사 분석보고서」
    한국연구재단 대전: 한국연구재단 [2013]
  • 「BK21-WCU 후속사업 기획 연구」
    오억수 이주헌 장덕호 하연섭 대전: 한국연구재단 [2012]
  • 「2단계 BK21 사업 백서」
  • Vinod, M. and Russell, S. (2013), Are More Senior Academics Really More Research Productive than Junior Academics? Evidence from Australian Law Schools, Scientomerics, 96: 411-425.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2003), The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabsch tzung ? Theorie und Praxis, 1: 20-29.
  • Thursby, J. and Marie, T. (2003), Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty, https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/ 1853/ 10723/gt_ tiger_patterns.pdf?sequence=1
  • Thursby, J. and Marie, T. (2002), Sources of Growth in University Licensing, Management Science, 48(1): 90-104.
  • Thursby, J. and Marie, T. (2001), Has Patent Licens ing Changed Academic Research?, NBER Working Paper, 9991.
  • Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J. and Grant, B. (2005), Who’s Patenting in the University? Evidence from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients, the Economics of Innovation and New Technology, www2.gsu.edu/~ecosgg/ research/pdf/sgsb_ eint.pdf.
  • Shin, J. C. (2009), Building World-Class Research Univers ity: The Brain Korea 21 project, High Educ, 58: 669-688.
  • Seol, S. S. (2012), A Model of University Reform in a Developing Country: The Brain Korea 21 Program, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 1(1): 31-49.
  • Sandstr m, U. (2009), Combining Curriculum Vitae and Bibliometric Analys is: Mobility, Gender and Research Performance, Research Evaluation, 18(2): 135-142.
  • Roe, A. (1956), 「The Psychology of Occupations」, New York: Wiley.
  • Res kin, B. F. (1980), 「Age and Scientific Productivity」, In The Demand for New Faculty in Science and Engineering.
  • Proceedings of the Workshop of Specialists in Forecasts of Demand for Scientists and Engineers, (1979), edited by Michael S. McPherson. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., 196-21 6., http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED193067.pdf.
  • Owen-Smith, J. and Walter W. P. (2003), The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity, Research Policy, 32(9): 1695?1711.
  • Oberg, W. (1960), Age and Achievement?and the Technical Man, Personnel Psychology, 12: 245-259.
  • Obembe, O. B. ( 2012), Determinants of scientific productivity among Nigerian University academics, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2): 2155-2164.
  • Merton, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science, American Sociological Review, 22: 635?659.
  • McGil. M. M. and Settle, A. (2012), Identifying Effects of Ins titutional Resources and Support on Computing Faculty Research Productivity, Tenure, and Promotion, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7: 187-198.
  • Markiewicz, K. R. and DiMinin, A. (2004), Commercializing the Laboratory: The Relationship Between Faculty Patenting and Publishing, IN-SAT Laboratory Working Paper Series, http://www.idm.sssup.it/wp/ 200402.pdf.
  • Mairesse, J. and Turner, L. (2005), Individual Differences in Scientific Research Productivity : How Important are non-individual determinants? An Econometric Study of French Phys icis ts ’ publications and citations (1986-1997), http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Turner2005.pdf.
  • Long, J. S. (1993), Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity, American Sociological Review, 58(5): 703?22.
  • Lewis, D. R. and Dundar, H. (1998), Determinants of research productivity in higher education, Research in Higher Education, 39(6): 607-631.
  • Levin, S. and Paula, S. (1998), Gender Differences in the Rewards to Publishing in Academe: Science in the 1970s, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, (38)11/ 12: 1049-1064.
  • Levin, S. G. and Stephan, P. E. (1991), Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists, American Economic Review, 81: 114-132.
  • Lehman, H. C. (1966), The Most Creative Years of Engineers and Other Technologists, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 108(2): 263-277.
  • Lehman, H. C. (1953), 「Age and Achievement」, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Lariviere, V., Gingras Y. and Archambault, E. (2006), Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities, Scientometrics, 68(3): 519?533.
  • Larivie `re, V., Vignola-Gagne , E., Villeneuve, C. Gelinas, P. and Gingras, Y. (2011), Sex Differences in Research Funding, Productivity and Impact: An Analysis of Quebec University Professors, Scientometrics, 87: 483-498.
  • Kyvik. S. (1990), Age and Scientific Productivity. Differences between Fields of Learning, Higher Education, 19(1): 37-55.
  • Kyvik, S. (1991), 「Productiviy in Academia. Scientific Publis hing at Norwegian Universities」, Oslo: Univers i,tetsforlaget.
  • Kotrlik J. W., Bartlett, J. E., Higgines, C. C. and Williams, H. A. (2002), Factors Associated with Research Productivity of Agricultural Education Faculty, Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3): 1-10.
  • Kim, S. J. and Byeon, S. C. (2012), An Evaluation on the Effect of Brain Korea 21 Phase II Program, http://www.iiis.org/CDs2011/ CD2011SCI / EISTA_2011/ PapersPdf/ EA787TA.pdf.
  • Kim, K. H. (2014), Research Productivity of Graduate Students in GPF Program of Korea, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 3(1): 72-93.
  • Kim, K. H. (2014), Determinants of Research Productivity: A Korean Case, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 3(2): 193-215.
  • Jonkers, K. and Tijssen, R. (2008), Chinese Researchers Returning Home: Impacts of International Mobility on Research Collaboration and Scientific Productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2): 309-333.
  • Jonkers, K. (2011), Mobility, Productivity, Gender and Career Development of Argentinean life Scientis ts, Research Evaluation, 20(5): 411-421.
  • Jacob, B. A. and Lefgren, L. (2011), The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity, Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10): 1168-1177.
  • Isabelle, M. (2007), Explaining the Balance between Publication and Patents as Outputs from Public-Private Collaborative R&D, DRUID Summe Conference, 1-29.
  • Hottenrott, H. and Lawson, C. (2014), Research Grants, Sources of Ideas and the Effects on Academic Research, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(2): 109-133.
  • Hoisl, K. (2005), A Closer Look at Inventor Productivity ?What Makes the Difference?, https://www.google.co.kr/?gws_rd=ssl# newwindow=1&q=A+Closer+ Look +at+Inventor+Productivity %E3%85%87(10 July 2014)
  • Hargens, L. L. (1975), 「Patterns of Scientific Research: a Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields」, Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Hags trom, W. O. (1965), 「The scientific community」, New York: Bas ic Books.
  • Gyllens ten K. and Palmer S. (2005), The role of gender in workplace s tress: A critical literature review, Health Education Journal, 64(3): 271-288.
  • Gonzalez-Brambila, C. and Veloso, F. M. (2007), The Determinants of Research Productivity: A Study of Mexican Researchers, Research Policy, 36( 7): 1035- 1051.
  • Godin, B. (2003), The Impact of Research Grants on the Productivity and the Quality of Scientific Research, INRS, WP, http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/NSERC.pdf.
  • Gl nzel W. and Schoepflin, U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences, Journal Information Processing and Management: an Int ernational Journal archive, 35(1): 31-44.
  • Fonseca, L., Veloso, S., Wofchuk, S. and Meis, L. D. (1997), The Importance of Human Relationships in Scientific Productivity, Scientometrics, 39(2): 159-171.
  • Eps tein, C. F. (1990), 「Deceptive distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Structure」, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dundar H. and Lewis D. R. (1998). Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6): 607-631.
  • Dietz and Bozeman (2005), Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, 34: 349?367.
  • Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1994), Toward a New Economics of Science. Research Policy, 23: 487-521.
  • Dalton, G. W. and Thompson, P. H. (1971), Accelerating Obsolescence of Older Engineers, Harvard Business Review, 49: 57-67.
  • Creamer, Elizabeth G. (1998), 「Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity: Issues of Equity」, ASHE-ERIC higher education report, 26(2), Washington, DC : George Washington Univers ity.
  • Cole, S.(1979). Age and scientific performance. The American Journal ofSociology, 84(4), 958-977.
  • Chu, J. H. (2012), Cumulative Advantage of Research Productivity: How Large Is It and Who Has It?, http://research.nus.biz/ Documents/Research% 20Paper%20Series/2012-009.pdf.
  • Cardoso, A. R., Guimaraes, R. and Zimmermann, K. F. (2008), Comparing the Early Research Performance of PhD Graduates in Labor Economics in Europe and the USA, IZA DP No. 3898, http:// ftp.iza.org/dp3898.pdf
  • Carayol, N. and Matt, M. (2004), Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists’ Productivity, Information Economics and Policy, 18(1): 55-72.
  • Carayol, N. and Matt, M. (2003), Does Research Organization influence Academic Production? Laboratory Level Evidence from a large European University, Research Policy, 33(8): 1081-1102.
  • Carayol, N. (2004), Academic Incentives and Research Organization for Patenting at a large French Univers ity, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2): 119-138.
  • Brans tetter, L. G. and Sakakibara, M. (2002), When do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data, The American Economic Review, 92(1): 143-159.
  • Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E., Anderson, M., Causino, N. and Louis, K. (1996), Withholding Research Results in Academic Lifescience: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty, Journal of The American Medical Association, 277: 1224? 1228.
  • Bland, C. J. and Berquist, W. H. ( 1997), 「The Vitality of Senior Faculty Members. Snow on the Roof-Fire in the Furnace」, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 25(7), Washington, DC : George Washington University.
  • Bland C. J., Center B. A., Finstad D A., Risbey K. R. and Staples J. G. (2005), A Theoretical, Practical, Predictive Model of Faculty and Department Research Productivity, Academic Medicine, 80( 3): 225-237.
  • Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E. and Hall, D. E. ( 1978), Research note: Correlates of Faculty Publications, Sociology of Education, 51(2): 132-141.
  • Betsey, C. L. (2007), Faculty research productivity: Ins titutional and personal determinants of faculty publications, Review of Black Political Economy, 34(1-2), 53-86.
  • Berelson, B. (1960), Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • BK21사업 재정지원의 상대적 효율성 분석
    김병주 교육재정 경제연구, 15(2): 235-259 [2006]
  • BK21 플러스 사업 기본계획
    교육부 서울: 교육부 [2013]
  • Audretsch, D. and Paula, S. (1999), Knowledge Spillovers in Biotechnology: Sources and Incentives, Evolutionary Economics, 9: 97-107.
  • Audretsch, D. and Paula, S. (1996), Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology, American Economic Review, 86: 641-652.
  • Agrawal, A. and Henderson R. (2002), Putting Patents in Context : Exploring Knowledge Trans fer from MIT, Management Science, 48(1): 44-60.
  • Abramo, G., Angelo C. A. and Caprasecca A. ( 2008), Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system, Scientometrics, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8.