연구동향 분석
박사

CSCL에서 협력적 논증을 지원하는 스캐폴드 효과분석 = Effects of scaffolds for collaborative argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning

방선희 2009년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 방선희
    • 형태사항 삽도: xiii, 244 p.: 27 cm
    • 일반주기 Abstract: p. 235-240, 指導敎授: 金東植, 부록: 1. 배경 지식 검사, 2. 논증 기술 검사, 3. 컴퓨터 활용 및 협력성향 검사 외, 국문초록: p. i-v, 참고문헌: p. 188-201
    • 학위논문사항 學位論文(博士)-, 2009. 8, 漢陽大學校 大學院, 敎育工學科
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2009
    • 발행사항 漢陽大學校 大學院
    • 주제어 교육방법
    유사주제 논문( 63)
인용/피인용
' CSCL에서 협력적 논증을 지원하는 스캐폴드 효과분석 = Effects of scaffolds for collaborative argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육방법
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
64 0

0.0%

' CSCL에서 협력적 논증을 지원하는 스캐폴드 효과분석 = Effects of scaffolds for collaborative argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning' 의 참고문헌

  • 웹에서의 지식구축을 위한 공동저술 활동에 관한 연구
    김동식 김지일 교육학연구 [2003]
  • 사고력 검사 개발 연구(I)
    김명숙 [2001]
  • 구성주의 기반의 학습이론 탐구
    조규락 교육공학연구 [2003]
  • visualization of agreement anddiscussion processes during computer-supported collaborativelearning
  • What do you mean by 'collaborative leaning'?
    Dillenbourg [1999]
  • Visualization of participation:Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning?
    Janssen,J. [2007]
  • VCRI: A groupware application for CSCLresearch
  • Using argument representations to make thinking visible forindivisuals and groups
    Bell [1997]
  • Using CMC to develop argumentation skills inchildre with a 'literacy defict'
  • Using Argumentation Vee Diagrams(AVDs) for Promoting Argument-Counterargument integration in Reflective Writing
    Nussbaum [2008]
  • The uses of argument (2ed.)
    Toulmin, S. [2003]
  • The uses of argument
    Toulmin, Stephen Edelston The uses of argument [1969]
  • The structure of discussion that promote reasoning
  • The skill of argument
    Kuhn, D. [1991]
  • The role of diagramsin collaborative argumentation-based learning
  • The place of dialogue theory in logic computer science andcommunication studies
    walton [2000]
  • The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts
  • The judgement and reasoning in children
    Piaget [1928]
  • The effects of constraint based argumentation scaffolding and epistemological beliefs on ill structured diagnosis-solution problem solving
    Oh, S. The effects of constraint based argumentation scaffolding andepistemological beliefs on ill structured diagnosis-solutionproblem solving [2004]
  • The effects of communication medium onargumentation and the development of critical thinking
  • The development of argumentive discourse skill
    Felton Kuhn [2001]
  • The development of argument skills
    Kuhn Udell [2003]
  • The blind and the paralytic: supportingargumentation in everyday and scientific issues
  • The Systemiatic Design of Instruction(5th ed.)
    Carey Dick [2003]
  • The Roots of Computer Supported Arguement Visualization
    Shum [2003]
  • The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building
    Leitao [2000]
  • Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments to SupportStudents' Argumentation
  • Supporting interactive argumentation:Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem
    Munneke,L. [2007]
  • Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability atthree grade level
    McCann [1989]
  • Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation
    Lave, Jean Situated Learning : Legitimate peripheralparticipation [1991]
  • Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems
  • ScriptingArgumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-SupportedLearning Environments
  • Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving
    Jonassen Oh, S. Scaffolding online argumentation during problemsolving [2007]
  • Research on knowledge elaboration in dialogues
    Baker [2004]
  • Representationaltools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-basedlearning: How dyads work with constructed and inspectedargumentative diagrams
  • Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry
    Suthers [2003]
  • Putting the pieces together:Online argumentation veediagrams enhance thinking during discussions
    Winsor,D.L. [2007]
  • Promotng student's argument construction and collaborativedebate in the science classroom
    Bell [2004]
  • Principles of Instructional Design(5th ed.)
  • Practices and orientations ofCSCL
  • Planning and Coordinating Activitiesin Collaborative Learning
    Erkens Jaspers Prangsma Planning and coordinatingactivities in collaborative learning [2006]
  • On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one
    Sfard On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing justone [1998]
  • Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes
    Vygotskii, L. S Mind in society: The Development of higher psychologicalprocesses [1978]
  • Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling
    Ohlsson Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and achallenge for cognitive modeling [1995]
  • Learning to Argue
    Chinn [2006]
  • Knowledge convergence incollaborative learning: Concepts and assessment
  • Karl Popper 칼 포퍼
  • Internal and External CollaborationScripts in Web based Science Learning at Schools
    Fischer Kollar Slotta Internal and External CollaborationScripts in Webbased Science Learning at Schools [2005]
  • Interactive expertise : Studies in distributed workingintelligence (No Research bulletin 83)
    Engestrm [1992]
  • Instructionalsupport in CSCL
    [2004]
  • How we think
    Dewey, John How We Think [1910]
  • How people learn : brain, mind, experience, and school
    Bransford, John How people learn: Brainmind [2000]
  • Historical reasoning in acomputer-supported collaborative learning environment
  • Histoire des Theories de L’argumentation
  • Fundamentals of argumentatio n theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemp orary developments
  • From axiom to dialogue: A philosophicalstudy of logics and argumentation
  • Foundations of argumentative textprocessing
  • Flexibility in macro-scripts for computersupportedcollaborative learning
    Dillenbourg Tchounikine Flexibility in macro-scripts forcomputersupported collaborative learning [2007]
  • Facilitating argumentativeknowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
    Fischer Stegmann Weinberger Facilitating argumentativeknowledge construction with computer-supported collaborationscripts [2007]
  • Externalrepresentation of argumentation in CSCL and the management ofcognitive load
  • Expolrations of participation in discourse
    Hesse Stahl [2008]
  • Epistemological foundationsfor CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledgecommunities
  • Elaborating new arguments through a CSCLscript
  • Effect of dyadic interation onargumentative reasoning
  • Education and mind in the knowledge age
  • Designing integrative scrips
  • Designing external representations tosupport solving wicked problems
  • Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions
    Dillenbourg [2005]
  • Designing a computer-supportedcollaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate
  • Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction
  • Critical thinking and education
  • Critical thinking
  • Construction ofcollaborative and individual knowledge in argumentative activity
    [2003]
  • Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicle for understanding scientific notions
    Baker Lund de Vries Computer-mediated epistemicdialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicle forunderstanding scientific notions [2002]
  • Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the coelaborationof scientific notion
    Baker [2003]
  • Computer-SupportedCollaborative Learning in the Space of Debate
    [2003]
  • Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation:
    Carr [2001]
  • Computer Support for knowledge construction in collaborativelearning environment
    [2005]
  • CollaborativeArgumentation and Cognitive Processing - An Empirical Study ina Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment
    [2007]
  • Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice
    Bowers Cobb Cognitive and situated learning: Perspectives intheory and practice [1999]
  • CSCL에서 스케폴딩의 유형이 공유정신모형에 미치는 영향
  • CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry: argumentation is learning
    Koschmann, T. CSCL [2003]
  • Building Collaborative Knowing
    Stahl Building collaborative knowing [2006]
  • Argumentation, Computer support,and the educational context of confronting cognitions
    Andriessen Baker Suthers Argumentation [2003]
  • Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing
    [2003]
  • Arguing to learn; Supporting interactive argumentation through Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
    Munneke,L. [2007]
  • Arguing to Learn
    Andriessen [2006]
  • AnalyticFrameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments
    [2007]
  • A space for debate: how diagrams supportcollaborative argumentation-based learning
  • A framework to analyze argumentative knowledgeconstruction in computer-supported collaborative learning
  • A developmental model of critical thinking
    Kuhn A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking [1999]
  • A cognitiveframwork for cooperative problem solving with argumentvisualization